My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05232
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05232
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:17:29 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:55:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8027
Description
Section D General Correspondence - Federal Agencies - BOR - Lower Missouri Region - Denver
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
10/1/1974
Author
Upper South Platte U
Title
Steering Committee Report - Upper South Platte Unit - Colorado - August 1974
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
162
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />00238r! <br /> <br />production of the forecasts as shown on Table 1, Denver Regiop.al Council <br />of Governments modified the study shown as Case 1 to reflect the annual <br />migration level during the period 1970 to 1980 to a level similar to that <br />pre sently ace urring J ca lled I1current level ". With that modification, a <br />prediction of a population by the year 2000 of 2. 35 million resulted. Plan <br />policies related to that prediction were adopted by the Denver Regional <br />Council of Governments on January 17, 1973, and are included in Table <br />No.2. <br /> <br />In the opening testimony of December 5, 1973, on the Council's consideration <br />of land use, public transportation and highway plans, Mr. Robert D. Farley, <br />Executive Director, Denver Regional Council of Governments, stated: IIThese <br />plans are among the most dramatic of any regional plans ever prepared for a <br />major U. S. urban area. Taken together, the policies and plans called for a <br />massive reversal of the idea that growth for growth's sake is good. The plans <br />specifically urges the controlling growth". <br /> <br /> <br />This projection of a population under 2.35 million by the year 2000 contains <br />a very major assumption that growth in the Denver Metropolitan area will <br />be controlled. Although the devices to accomplish this objective are yet to <br />be developed, it would appear that the objective is a meritorious one; how- <br />ever, it must be kept in mind that, based upon today' s projections into the <br />future, a population of the metropolitan area will be limited to Under 2.35 <br />million only if future growth is controlled and does not continue at the <br />present level. <br /> <br />Other agencies within the State of Colorado devote efforts to population pro- <br />jections and are considered to be knowledgeable in that field. One of those <br />agencies is the Colorado Division of Planning. That division developed <br />population projections of the Denver SMSA from information obtained from <br />Cbunty Commissioners and Mayors of Colorado cities and towns. That in- <br />formation was obtained through questionnaires sent on December 1, 1973, <br />and resulted in projections by the Colorado Division of Planning of 2.9 to <br />3.4 million people in the Denver SMSA by the year 2000. Another study <br />was accomplished in cooperation with the Colorado Division of Planning by <br />the Business Research Division of the University of Colorado under an <br />urban planning grant from the Department of Housing and Urban Development. <br />This study utilized first a simulation model which projected total state pop- <br />ulation and employment for the years 1975 and 1980, and a second method <br />utilizing a cohort-survival technique to yield county population projections <br />for those years using the simulation totals as a control. The study of the <br />Business Research Division produced a projection of population for the year <br />1980 of 1.8 million people. This projection is compared with the other pro- <br />jections of the State of Colorado, Division of Planning and the Denver Regional <br />Council of Governments on Table 3. <br /> <br /> <br />";- ';~.:;>::'-~ <br /> <br />,- ;:;- --:-::.- '~_:-:" >/\: <br /> <br />'..~ . <br />'"p - ". -". ~- <br />.". ....-;..: <br /> <br />/ <br /> <br />-6- <br /> <br />{:~;~:-:t;" ..:.:...~;.' ". <br /> <br />".;' <br /> <br />.. <br />'-.- .. <br /> <br />r... <br /> <br />.>. .' <br /> <br />..;" <br />?~,... " . <br />.".,"..;- ,: <br />'-".". ',' . ~... -.. <br /> <br />}!;i~'"~~t~;?~;, ;,>d:";:;::~Y':' \'f~;~;;;t:;. :""::i:':~F':~('~JF~"':;':F.~'~:1:~:j~;::::;"':;';1i~;~Ef:'~", '~,t,':}2,~ti~f;:t~\1~'!l;i{SZ~~(tf;,tj;~~':r'i~~;~?:~~fM~:::.':':'/'~ <br /> <br />< ..-~--". <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.