Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Power Repayment Study <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />;., <br />\ ,. <br />Blue Mesa Dam Power plant Hoover Dam, Boulder Canyon PrOject <br /> <br />Results of the power repayment study for <br />fiscal year 1979 are depicted in the graph <br />on page 32. Estimated annual power <br />revenues are shown together with their ap- <br />plication. Total revenues for the period <br />shown exceed $4.9 billion. After repay- <br />ment of about $1.2 billion for the power <br />investment and replacements and $402 <br />million for interest, power revenues should <br />be sufficient to repay about $84 million in <br />irrigation costs and provide around $1.6 <br />billion for assistance in repayment of par- <br />ticipating projects. <br /> <br />Following are explanatory notes on the <br />terms used on the graph. Caples at the <br />power repayment study in a highly de- <br />tailed form can be obtained upon request. <br /> <br />Annual Operating Expenses <br /> <br />Annual costs of power and salinity control <br />operation and maintenance. <br /> <br />Energy Purchases <br /> <br />Annual costs of purchases for firming <br />energy for fuel conservation and for <br />energy to replace the deficiency in Hoover <br />Dam Powerplant generation caused by <br />storage project operations. In past years, <br />energy purchases for fuel conservation are <br />shown as an energy purchase expense <br />32 <br /> <br />and the revenues from energy sales for <br />fuel conservation are included in the gross <br />revenues. In future years, it was assumed <br />that there would be no energy purchases <br />for fuel conservation. <br /> <br />Replacements <br /> <br />Payments made on power replacements <br />with the highest interest-bearing compo- <br />nent (whether replacements or other <br />power investments) being paid first. <br /> <br />Power Interest Payments <br /> <br />Annual interest on the unpaid power <br />investment. <br /> <br />Power Principal Payments <br /> <br />Payments made on the power investment <br />with the highest interest.bearing compo- <br />nent (whether power investment or re- <br />placement) being paid first. <br /> <br />Storage Unit Irrigation Principal Payments <br /> <br />Power revenues which are applied toward <br />payment of the irrigation allocation of the <br />storage units. Their revenues repay the <br />major portion (about $84 million or 82 per. <br />cent) at each costs with the remainder <br />(about $18 million, or 18 percent) being <br /> <br />repaid from M&I water revenues. <br /> <br />Power Revenues Available for Irrigation <br />Assistance to Participating Projects <br /> <br />Power revenues available after the above <br />costs have been paid, the amount of <br />which will be about $1,610 million through <br />year 2052, A lesser amounf (about $13 <br />million or 1 percent of the total available) <br />will also be available trom M&I water <br />revenues. <br /> <br />Total Annual Power Revenues <br /> <br />Annual revenues obtained from energy and <br />capacity sales, wheeling for others, rental <br />of substation facilities to others, reim- <br />bursement by the Lower Basin for energy <br />purchased by the CRSP to replace the <br />deficiency in Hoover Dam Powerplant <br />generation, and miscellaneous revenues. <br />In the study, the tirm power rate of $1.34 <br />per kilowatt-month and 3.4 mills per <br />kilowatt-hour was increased to a rate of <br />$1.76 per kilowatt-month and 4.1 mills per <br />kilowatt-hour at the beginning of fiscal <br />year 1981. The power rate increased to <br />$1.87 per kilowatt-month and 4.4 milis per <br />kilowatt-hour beginning in fiscal year 1984. <br />Rate adjustment procedures are nearing <br />completion for the October 1, 1980, rate <br />increase. <br />