My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05213
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05213
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:17:25 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:54:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8407
Description
Platte River Basin - River Basin General Publications
State
CO
Basin
South Platte
Water Division
1
Date
3/1/1982
Author
Arthur D Little Inc
Title
Six State High Plains-Ogallala Aquifer Regional Resources Study - Study Element B-2 - National and Regional Price Impact Assessment
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
174
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />n"''<~~'' <br />(}:)~..Jv j <br /> <br />Regional Shares <br /> <br />The shares of production subcomponent is based upon time series data <br />of the percent of national production of each crop produced within the <br />individual states. For states with decl ining shares of production, <br />Cobb-Douglas functions were used. For states with increasing shares of <br />production, the Spillman function was used. In both functional forms time <br />was the independent variable. The projected shares to the year 2020 were <br />then adjusted by a multiplicative value derived as the inverse of the sum <br />of each commodity's projected shares across all states in which that com- <br />modity was produced. This resulted in each commodity's total production <br />always being 100 percent of the national total. The projections resul ting <br />from this method were then subjected to the review of individuals with com- <br />mOdity and state knowledge. Where deemed appropriate specific shares were <br />modified by the reviewing group. When the percentage of production in any <br />state was adjusted by this peer group, those states whose share had not <br />been adjusted were again modified by a constant multiplier such that allo- <br />cation of 100 percent of each commodity's production was accomplished. The <br />resulting shares were then again reviewed by the group until consensus was <br />achieved. For this analysis. the assumption has been made that the shares <br />of production will remain constant from 2000 to 2020. <br /> <br />11-49 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.