Laserfiche WebLink
<br />"'';''-''~''-'",...,;-.-.,' "';"',y,:. <br /> <br />00 <br />J") <br />'::t) <br />:. <br />C~J <br />c.:J <br /> <br />develop an appropriate correction to the accrued credits of Colorado and New Mexico existing <br /> <br />at the beginning of 200 I when they meet to perform the Compact accounting for 200 I, <br /> <br />Comoact Accounting Documentation <br />The Engineer Advisers decided at its 2000 meeting to concurrently review and <br />document, with the commitment of the Upper Rio Grande Water Operations Model <br />(URGWOM) modeling team, the procedures for Compact accounting of Rio Grande and San <br />Juan-Chama Project water. The Engineer Advisers and URGWOM representatives agreed to <br />meet as necessary during 2000 to complete this review. One meeting on this subject was held <br />in April 2000. A subsequent meeting was set for May 10, 2000 but was cancelled by <br />Reclamation without rescheduling. Other meetings during 2000 were requested by the <br />Engineer Advisers and agreed to, but never were scheduled by Reclamation management. The <br />Engineers Advisers met with Reclamation on January 19, 200 I and discussed this issue. <br />Reclamation at that time proposed to contract with Garry Rowe, fonner Area Manager of <br />Reclamation's Albuquerque office, for this purpose. Additional detail was provided at the <br />Engineer Advisers meeting. Reclamation committed to provide the scope of work and <br />anticipated schedule for Mr. Rowe's work to the Engineer Advisers prior to the March 2001 <br />meeting of the Commission. Reclamation stated its expectation of completion of the <br />documentation project by Fall 200 I. <br /> <br />URGWOM Accounting Model <br />At the 2000 meeting of the Engineer Advisers the URGWOM project team leader <br />agreed that the Compact accounting produced by URGWOM would be validated against <br />historic Compact accounting and the 2000 accounting produced by Reclamation's current <br />accounting methods prior to consideration by the Commission for approval for use in <br />Compact accounting. The Commission concurred with this approach at its 2000 meeting. <br />Reclamation presented initial results of this comparison for years 1995, 1996, and <br />2000 to the Engineer Advisers at their January and February 200 I meetings. The Engineer <br />Advisers requested additional documentation prior to the March 22 meeting of the <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br /> <br />. i:{<Ai,._-'/}. <br /> <br /> <br />..;.;"'j~;-"",;",~; <br />;~'.~r-"~:-~';;_:<:, <br />'.,,:~....:i'-I" <br />~l~:,~y~~ I <br />~~f~"'i; -7.t~"~ <br />i:::' ,.~;'" _ . ."'t:.-i,fi> <br />"';::.~:,>.jl'" ""'6~." <br />'f.~..v.. .....,.;o"....>~ <br />~..~..~. -~,.,.~'..:..,-. <br /> <br /> <br />