My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05167
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05167
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:17:15 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:53:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.104.I
Description
Flaming Gorge
State
UT
Basin
Yampa/White/Green
Date
10/1/2001
Author
Clayton-Gilmore
Title
Flaming Gorge Environmental Impact Statement Hydrologic Modeling Study Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />2 <br />All major elements of the Green River System are represented in the Green River model <br />and some elements are more accurately represented than others, The Green River below Flaming <br />Gorge Dam is divided into three sections, known as reaches, in the Flow Recommendations. All <br />three of these reaches are represented in the Green River model. Reach One extends from the <br />tailrace of Flaming Gorge Dam to the confluence with the Yampa River. Reach Two extends <br />from the confluence of the Green River with the Yampa River to the confluence of the Green <br />River with the White River. Reach Three extends from the confluence of the Green River with <br />the White River to where the Green River meets the Colorado River. The flows for Reaches One <br />and Two are more accurate in the model than those for Reach Three. This is because the effects <br />of the White and Duchesne Rivers on the flows in the Green River are not fully understood. At <br />this point, these river systems have not been adequately modeled to determine how they will be <br />regulated and developed in the future. For this reason, results for Reach Three have not been <br />included in this report. <br /> <br />The Green River model routes natural flows (river flows that do not include human <br />interferences such as depletion and regulation), referred to as input hydrology, through the <br />reservoir system on the Green River (Fontenelle and Flaming Gorge Reservoirs). A monthly <br />natural flow database was developed for the Upper Colorado River Basin for use as input <br />hydrology for CRSS. The input hydrology for the Green River model was selected from this <br />database. A period of record was selected that had the most complete natural flow dataset <br />available for the Upper Green River Basin, This period begins in January 1921 and ends in <br />December 1985 (65 calendar years). The natural flow data is being extended to 1995, however, <br />this work has not yet been completed. The Green River model will be reevaluated with this <br />additional data for the Final Flaming Gorge EIS. <br /> <br />The initial conditions of the Green River model were selected to be the state of the Green <br />River system in January of 2002 as described in the 2000 Annual Operating Plan (AOP) for <br />Colorado River System Reservoirs, The 2000 AOP was based on the August 2000 run of the 24- <br />Month Study Operational Model of the Colorado River. The Green River model runs for 39 <br />years to December 2040. <br /> <br />Beyond 2040, estimated depletion schedules for water users represented in the model <br />were considered too speculative to be useful. Depletion schedules were updated to reflect water <br />development forecasts produced by the Upper Colorado River Commission (1999), Given the <br />uncertain nature of water development schedules far into the future, and the fact that the model <br />predicted reservoir elevations that appeared stabile in the distant future, ending the model run in <br />2040 was reasonable. <br /> <br />Different hydrologic scenarios, referred to as input traces, are routed through the Green <br />River model. Each trace is one set of 39 years of natural flows, Because the input hydrology for <br />the model is based on historic hydrology, all the input traces have a high probability of occurring <br />in the future. No single input trace, or set of input traces, has a higher probability of occurring <br />then any of the other input traces. The Index Sequential Method (ISM) was used to construct 65 <br />input traces for the Green River model from the natural flow dataset selected, The ISM involves <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.