My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05167
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05167
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:17:15 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:53:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.104.I
Description
Flaming Gorge
State
UT
Basin
Yampa/White/Green
Date
10/1/2001
Author
Clayton-Gilmore
Title
Flaming Gorge Environmental Impact Statement Hydrologic Modeling Study Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~\J <br /> <br />Flaming Gorge Environmental Impact Statement <br />Hydrologic Modeling Study Report <br /> <br />Results of Action and No Action Alternative Analysis <br />R. Clayton and A. Gilmore <br />October I, 2001 <br /> <br />Introduction <br /> <br />A model of the Green River Basin has been developed to simulate the operations of <br />Flaming Gorge Dam under varying hydrologic conditions. The Green River model was <br />developed for the purpose of characterizing the hydrologic effects to Flaming Gorge Reservoir <br />and the Green River below Flaming Gorge Dam caused by the implementation of the proposed <br />alternatives for the Flaming Gorge Dam Environmental Impact Statement (Flaming Gorge EIS). <br /> <br />Two alternatives have been proposed for the Flaming Gorge EIS. The Action Alternative <br />requires Flaming Gorge Dam to be operated to achieve the flow recommendations described in <br />the "Flow and Temperature Recommendations for Endangered Fishes in the Green River <br />Downstream of Flaming Oorge Dam" (Flow Recommendations). The No Action Alternative <br />requires Flaming Gorge Dam to be operated to achieve the recommended flows described in the <br />1992 Biological Opinion on the Operation of Flaming Gorge Dam (1992 Biological Opinion). <br />At the present time, and since 1992, Flaming Gorge Dam has been operated to achieve the flow <br />objectives of the 1992 Biological Opinion, <br /> <br />For each of these alternatives, the authorizing pwposes of Flaming Gorge Reservoir are to <br />be "maintained" in such a way that impacts to these resources are minimized. In the Green River <br />model, rules to operate Flaming Gorge Dam to achieve the flow objectives described in the Flow <br />Recommendations and the 1992 Biological Opinion were developed. These rules were then <br />modified to reduce the occurrences and magnitudes of bypass releases while still achieving the <br />flow objectives of the alternative. Reducing the occurrences and magnitudes of bypasses was the <br />method used to "maintain" the purposes for which Flaming Gorge Dam was authorized. <br /> <br />The purpose of this report is to summarize the hydrologic effects observed in the model <br />output as a result of achieving the flow objectives of each proposed alternative, The results in <br />this report focus on the model output from Flaming Gorge Reservoir and the Green River below <br />Flaming Gorge Dam. <br /> <br />Modeling Scope <br /> <br />The Green River model was created from an existing model called the Colorado River <br />Simulation System (CRSS). The CRSS has been used for several years to identify impacts to <br />reservoirs in the Colorado River Basin under different hydrologic scenarios. Most recently, <br />CRSS was used to quantify the impacts of the proposed alternatives for the Colorado River <br />Interim Surplus Criteria Environmental Impact Study (2000), <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.