Laserfiche WebLink
<br />COL...ORADO RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT SlUDY: FINAL... REPORT <br /> <br />framework fails to adequately respond to changing demands <br />and values is prejudging your study before it has been done <br />(and certainly is a matter of opinion). Preservation of the <br />Law of the River, and reliance on and support of the <br />Colorado River Compacts is not necessarily bad. <br /> <br /> <br />ISSUES THAT INVOLVE THE INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK OF BASIN MANAGEMENT <br /> <br />JOHN RITENOUR <br />GLEN CANYON NRA <br />PAGE, AZ <br />Recreation values beyond river running, lake associated <br />recreation, fishing, commercial use such as concessions, etc. <br /> <br />Having just come through a drought, an analysis of <br />impacts could help predict future consequences. The best <br />laid plans will be affected by future droughts and plan- <br />ning should use drought conditions as a parameter, not <br />normal precipitation. <br /> <br />JANET ROGERS <br />COLORADO R.IVER COMMISSION O~ NV <br />LAS VEGAS, NV <br />Add a new bullet reading <br />- Need mechanisms to implement water marketing for <br />long term transfers of water within the Colorado River <br />Basin. <br /> <br />ROBERT SCHEMPP <br />METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CA <br />Los ANGELES, CA <br />This topic is of great interest to Metropolitan. The entities <br />which have participated in attempting to develop the . <br />regional solution most recently include the states of <br />California and Nevada and water agencies in those states <br />which hold contracts with the Secretary of the Interior, <br />Indian tribes with present perfected rights to Colorado <br />River water, and the Department of the interior. Mr Abe <br />Sofaer has been facilitating the process. The State of <br />Arizona and agencies in Arizona which hold water deliv- <br />ery contracts had participated in previous discussions <br />under the auspices of a Lower Basin Technical Committee <br />which explored a number of regional solution elements. <br />The basin-wide dispute resolution forum suggested in the <br />first bullet is a variation of one of the elements being con- <br />sidered by the entities. <br /> <br />BILL SWAN <br />001, OFFICE OF THE SOLICITOR <br />PHOENIX, AZ <br />Need, below Hoover Dam, a land use plan/comprehensive <br />study, There are many managing agencies + private land = <br />a hodgepodge. Lots o[]and managers between Hoover <br />and Powell.. <br /> <br />JOHN SHIELDS <br />STATE ENGINEER'S OFFICE <br />CHEYENNE, WY <br />The first bullet under 10 (Federal versus State, Tribal, and <br />Local roles in management) certainly also applies, and in <br />my view, is a critical component part of Issue NO.3 Issues <br />that involve to institutional framework. I strongly feel it <br />should be treated as a part of Issue No.3. <br /> <br />The Bureau of Reclamation is actively involved in the <br />process (ongoing) that is expanding/pushing the envelope <br />with regard to the institutional framework in the Lower <br />Colorado Region. This has both positive as well as negative <br />effects and is bringing issues to bear that have never been <br />addressed in the past. I feel that the statement management <br /> <br />DUANE L. SHROUFE <br />ARIZONA DEPT. OF GAME AND FISH <br />PHOENIX, AZ <br />Issues that involve the institutional framework of basin <br />management are clearly important from the perspective of <br />conserving wildlife and wildlife habitat. However, in <br />addressing these kinds of issues it is critical to recognize <br />the authorities vested at the State and Local levels. Basin- <br />wide or Sub-Basin-wide approaches that address important <br />wildlife resources on a landscape scale clearly point out <br />feasiple and achievable strategies for conservation. They <br />cannot, however, result in the abrogation of authority vest- <br />ed in the states. Ultimately, as with environmental protec- <br />tion 'and coordination between managers, they must devel- <br />op consensus based approaches. <br /> <br />RONALD 1'HOMPSON <br />WASHINGTON COUNTY WATER CONSERVANCY DISTRICT <br />ST. 'GEORGE, UT <br />Long-term water use planning: <br />- D~termining future needs <br />- Pursuing projects to meet those needs <br />- Assurance of water supply <br />- Assurance of in-stream flows <br />- Water conservation <br /> <br />River management: <br />- Floodplain management <br />- Habitat conservation and management <br />- Channel maintenance <br />- B~dload transport and discharge <br /> <br />KENT TURNER <br />LA~E MEAD NRA <br />BOULDER CITY, NV <br />To ~ccomplish integration of the operational criteria with <br />resource requirements, it seems you need an institutional <br />framework for basin management and conflict resolution <br />and forum for rights adjudication. <br /> <br />RIOHARD WAHL <br />UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO <br />BOULDER,CO <br />I think it will be increasingly important for institutions in the <br />baiin to accommodate flexibility in water use, whether that <br />be in response to environmental concerns, increased popula- <br />tion pressure, drought, climatic change, or from other <br />sources. Flexible institutions need to be developed to consid- <br />er, develop rules for, simulate, and implement water transfers <br />and water banking, both within states and between states, <br /> <br />A'i'DY WALCH <br />DqU, GENERAL LITIGATION <br />DENVER, CO <br />Subsumes environmental protection issues (#8), <br />Global Issues <br />