Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ApPENDIX I <br /> <br />ISSUES OF ALLOCATIONS; RECONCILING SUPPLY WITH DEMAND <br /> <br />'j' <br /> <br />W.B. LORD <br />BOULDER, CO <br />Consumptive water uses throughout the basin are wasteful <br />and inefficient. Much should be done to improve this situa- <br />tion. Improving irrigation efficiency, through ditch lining, <br />ete., can be useful, but far more important is getting rid of <br />economically inefficient and environmentally damaging <br />irrigation in the first place. Similarly, urban water conserva- <br />tion can be useful, but discouraging urban growth in <br />water-short areas is more fundamental. <br /> <br />WAYNE MARCHANT <br />CRD~LAS VEGAS, USEPA <br />LAS VEGAS, NV <br />Conservation and efficient water use, especially with <br />. respect to agriculture, is the most important issue. <br /> <br />JERRY MASON <br />UTAH WILDLIFE FE:DERATION <br />BRIGHAM CITY. UT <br />Without a plan no one can manage. <br /> <br />DAVID OSIAS <br />ALLEN, MATKINS, L.ECK, GAMBLE & MALLORY <br />SAN DIEGO, CA <br />Focus should be on maximum utilization of the finite <br />resources-promoting efficiency in consumptive and non- <br />consumptive use; storage as a device to stretch availability; <br />and ma.rketing/transfers as a tool for reallocation are central <br />to future Colorado River management. <br /> <br />LORI POTTER <br />SIERRA CLUB LEGAL DEFENSE F'UND <br />DENVER, CO <br />Water Marketing - What mechanisms are needed to address <br />the legal and legislative issues needed to get from here to <br />there. What needs to happen to get past legal barriers? <br /> <br />REGIONAL STAKEHOLDER MEETING <br />FARMINGTON, NM <br />Old irrigation policies (flood irrigation) almost impossible <br />to change. <br /> <br />REGIONAL STAKEHOLDER MEETING <br />SALT LAKE C rTY, UT <br />Opportunities for voluntary participation in conservation <br />efforts. <br /> <br />Make conservation market driven. Farmers will do what is <br />needed to make profits. It's not the pricing of the water but <br />the pricing of the commodity. <br /> <br />REGIONAL STAKEHOLDER MEETING <br />LAS VEGAS, NV <br />Ground water management is an issue. <br /> <br />Opportunities for conservation by the end users is an issue. <br /> <br />Opportunities for surface water storage of Colorado River <br />water is an issue. <br /> <br />The definition of conservation itself is an issue. For exam- <br />ple, is increased storage conservation as well as less <br />demand' <br /> <br />Impacts on groundwater from surface water management <br />decisions. <br /> <br />REGIONAL STAKEHOLDER MEETING <br />ONTARIO, CA <br />Intrastate water marketing is also an issue. <br /> <br />The issue is reservoir storage not simply groundwater <br />storage. <br /> <br />There is a need for a better institutional framework to <br />look at better use, and have ability to move water. All bul- <br />lets under this topic are very broad issues, except for "use <br />it or lose it" bullet, which is very specific. Perhaps it <br />would be valuable to have more specifics bullets here. <br /> <br />It is important to continue the basic premise that any <br />user/diverter should put water to beneficial and reason- <br />able use. <br /> <br />Opportunities for incentives for efficient water use. <br /> <br />Opportunities for water reuse - problems /opportunities for. <br /> <br />There is a responsibility of water diverter and the end user <br />for efficient water use. <br /> <br />REGIONAL STAKEHOLDER MEETING <br />ROCK SPRINGS, WY <br />"Use it or lose itl! is a negative statement. We don't see <br />that philosophy here. <br /> <br />We1ve never discussed water use in the lIuse it or lose it" <br />phraseology. Don't know of any state or body that has <br />gone out under this concept alone and done things. <br /> <br />The idea was that under the compact, a state doesn't have <br />to go out and build a lot of storage projects in order to <br />protect their entitlement. <br /> <br />Need to clarify the distinction of "use it or lose it" in rela- <br />tion to the Compact and in relation to state water rights. <br /> <br />There will always be concerns of transfers. Utah can do <br />what it wants with its water, but their actions affects the <br />whole upper basin. Any interstate transfer proposals <br />should be shared openly. <br /> <br />Something wrong using an agricultural water rights for <br />non-ag purposes in California, can't do that in Wyoming. <br />Consistency in application of state water laws. <br /> <br />HAL SIMPSON <br />DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES <br />DENVER, CO <br />Urban water conservation opportunities. <br />