My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05164
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05164
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:17:14 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:53:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.300.20.F.1
Description
Grand Canyon Trust
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
4/1/1997
Author
Grand Canyon Trust
Title
Colorado River Basin Management Study
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />COLORADO RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT STUDY: FINAL REPORT <br /> <br />ISSUES OF ALLOCATIONS: RECONCILlN'i SUPPLY WITH DEMAND <br /> <br />BUREAU OF RECLAMATION MEETING <br />PHOENIX, AZ <br />Uncertainty of adjudication of federal water rights. <br /> <br />The fact that we've priced the water in Al beyond the <br />ability of irrigators to pay. <br /> <br />General adjudication: Ped water rights issues on table, still <br />face number of years of uncertainty. <br /> <br />State attempts to regulate water use by establishing AMAs <br />(active management areas). See these sprouting up in sev- <br />eral basins. <br /> <br />Prior appropriation won't go out the window, but we will <br />make concrete the rules for transfer. <br /> <br />BRIAN CLUER <br />NATIONAL PARK SE:RVICE, WATER RESOURCES <br />DIVISION <br />FT. COLLiNS, CO <br />Without population control, there will continue to be <br />pressure on water resources. The only alternative is to <br />develop conservation strategies with incentives and <br />rewards for using less water. Por this idea to have any <br />effect, people are going to have to learn to live in their <br />environments rather than modifying them, ie. fountains <br />in deserts, bluegrass in deserts, etc. <br /> <br />WAYNE. COOK <br />UPPER COLORADO RIveR LAKE COMMISSION <br />CITY, UT <br />Water Market Huckstering (1) Fostered by greed rather <br />than viable solutions (2) Looked to because it's cheap <br />rather than realistic (3) Diverts attention away from useful <br />and necessary planning activities (4) Develops unrealistic <br />expectations among some while destroying willingness to <br />cooperate among others (5) Unhealthy setting in which to <br />attempt to discover regional or Basin-wide solutions. <br /> <br />DONAL.D K. FREVERT J CRAIG PHILLIPS <br />BUREAU OF RECLAMATION <br />DENVER, co <br />Identifying flexibility within existing project authorization <br />to more equitably serve an expanded range of functions, <br /> <br />State legislative initiatives with the objective of revising state <br />law to accommodate increased efficiencies of water use. <br /> <br />ELIZABETH GARDENER <br />DENVER WATER <br />DENVER, CO <br />Conservation/Coordination. If downstream states are more <br />efficient in their water use there will be more water avail- <br />able to us to keep in Colorado. <br /> <br />AMOS JOHNSON <br />DEPT OF WATER RESOURCE; NAVAJO NATION <br />FORT DEFIANCE, AZ <br />Interstate and inter-basin water marketing is a critical <br />issue to the Navajo Nation. <br /> <br />MIK~ COWAN <br />WES:TERN AREA POWER ADMINISTRATION <br />GOLDEN, CO <br />Suggest adding the following examples: <br />- public and private incentives to conserve and preserve <br />water resources. <br />- definition of surplus and shortage conditions. <br />- allocation of surplus and shortage in water supply. <br />- opportunities for re-use of water. <br /> <br />CH~IS GEHLKER <br />SIERRA CLUB, GRAND CANYON CHAPTER <br />PH0ENIX, AZ <br />The current legal/institutional framework encourages ineffi- <br />ciency in the use of water. Reform of this system is an <br />importanl goal. <br /> <br />MAiUREEN GEORGE <br />LAKE HAVASU CITY <br />LAKE HAVASU CITY, AZ <br />Is there an economlcally feasible way to make recharge in <br />Central AZ available to river communities? <br /> <br />DAVID GUY <br />CAuFORNIA FARM BUREAU FEDE:RATION <br />SACRAMENTO, CA <br />T11:e conservation and transfer of water, particularly agricul- <br />tutal water, is an essential issue to management within the <br />C010rado River for all parties. This issue is closely related <br />to ifssue No.3 involving the institutional framework, since <br />they are both essential for adequate management of the <br />Colorado River. <br /> <br />JC)HN HAMILL <br />COLORADO RIVER RECOVERY PROGRAM, USFWS <br />DENVER, CO <br />Iri.terstate water sales and transfers. <br />i <br /> <br />E!. RICHARD HART <br />I*STITUTE OF' THE NORTH AMERICAN WEST <br />SEATTLE, WA <br />T,he Southwest is notorious for lagging distantly behind in <br />establishing conservation programs and opportunities. <br /> <br />~AM HYDE <br />.l\MERICAN RIVERS <br />ffHOENIX, AZ <br />q)pportunities for conservation/efficient water use are need- <br />dd to provide the flexibility - both institutionally and witn- <br />i~ the given constraint of a finite resource under huge <br />qfemand - that we now lack. Clearly the basins growth and <br />demand for water will eventually exceed the supply avail- <br />able, unless we constantly work to identify and implement <br />~reative solutions to the growing problem. Removing barri- <br />ers to efficient water use will allow implementation of more <br />loglcal means of matching supply to demand. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.