My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05164
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05164
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:17:14 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:53:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.300.20.F.1
Description
Grand Canyon Trust
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
4/1/1997
Author
Grand Canyon Trust
Title
Colorado River Basin Management Study
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />ApPENDIX 1 <br /> <br />ISSUES INVOLVING HYDROPOWER PRICES/MARKETING/REVENUES <br /> <br />DAVID LUTTRELL <br />LINCOLN COUNTY POWER <br />prOCHE, NV <br />No specific comment. <br /> <br />DANIEL MCARTHUR <br />CITY OF ST. GEORGE <br />SI. GEORGE, UT <br />The hydropower from the dams constructed on the <br />Colorado is our low cost imbedded resource that makes it <br />possible to compete with the private sector who have their <br />low cost imbedded resources. In addition, the resource is <br />clean, renewable and environmentally safe. We feel that <br />most of the recent decisions made as a result of studies <br />completed on the river system are inappropriate and not <br />well founded. <br /> <br />TOM MORRIS <br />WATER QUALITY/WETLANDS, NAVAJO NATION <br />WINDOW ROCK, AZ <br />Sotlrces state that currently available and oncoming tech- <br />nologies in energy efficiency and production i.e., solar <br />conld, if implemented, drastically reduce the need for elec- <br />tricity from hydro, coal, nukes, oil/gas. <br /> <br />DAVID ONSTAD <br />LIICHFIELD PARK, AZ <br />Many of the currently proposed alternatives for environ- <br />mental mitigation place severe restrictions on the way <br />hydro facilities are operated. Glen Canyon Powerplant has <br />had its operational flexibility greatly reduced. It also has <br />had maximum flow rates imposed which reduce the maxi- <br />mum amount of power which can be produced. Operating <br />costs have remained constant, which means that the cost of <br />the reduced amount of electric power generated must <br />increase to maintain the current revenue stream. <br /> <br />PHIL MUTZ <br />NEW MEXICO INTERSTATE STREAM COMMISSION <br />SANTA FE, NM <br />No specific comment. <br /> <br />DAVID ONSTAD <br />LITCHFIELD PARK, AZ <br />In the past, wholesale and retail electric power rates have <br />generally been cost based without much regard for market <br />forces. State and federal regulators had established elabo- <br />rate review procedures with the intent of controlling the <br />prices utilities charged for the electric power and energy <br />sold under their jurisdictions. <br /> <br />The Electric Power Act of 1992 is changing the way electric <br />power is priced by moving it from a regulated environment <br />to a free market environment. The traditional vertically <br />integrated electric utility is already competing with inde- <br />pendent power producers and non utility generators in the <br />supply of generation area of the business. <br /> <br />The transmission and distribution areas of the business are <br />also getting closer to true competition. However, before <br />this is possible, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission <br />(FERC) will have to establish rules for the transmission sys- <br /> <br />tem which will open it up to all suppliers and users on an <br />equal basis, so an electric utility cannot use its transmis- <br />sion system to compete unfairly with other power produc- <br />ers and distribution companies. FERC is currently work- <br />ing on rules to remove the market lever transmission <br />companies currently have in the transmission area. <br /> <br />We have already seen wholesale electric rates fall as the <br />independent power producers bring on newer, more effi- <br />cient generation to compete with those power plants <br />which have higher costs. Just because a company has a <br />power plant doesn1t mean that they can always recover <br />the costs associated with the more expensive methods of <br />producing electricity. Power producers must compete with <br />other producers and those with a reliable product at an <br />attractive price will sell the most electric power. <br /> <br />DAVID ONSTAD <br />LITCH FI ELO PARK, AZ <br />Federal power rates are still cost based rates. Beca.use of <br />large investments in transmission, visitor centers, replace- <br />ments and environmental studies, these rates have <br />increased dr<1matically in the p<1st few years, particularly <br />in the Southeast. The following table shows the rates for <br />the last 10 years. <br /> <br />Year SLClP BCP APA <br />1983 9.92 <br />1986 3.15 <br />1987 6.75 14.17 <br />1991 16.20 10.21 20.70 <br />1993 16.72 14.56 24.20 <br />1995 1221 25.11 <br /> <br />The CSRP and Boulder Canyon rates have had the largest <br />increases. These rates are starting to exceed current rates <br />for spot market power. While spot market power is not <br />suitable for most smaller utilities without some generating <br />capacity they can use for reserves, the price doesn(t have <br />to go much higher before it cannot compete in todayts <br />emerging free market system. The ability to greatly <br />increase the price of electricity to pay for environmental <br />mitigation cannot be accomplished without paying atten- <br />tion to the ma.rket price of electricity. <br /> <br />FRED PARADY <br />RHONE-POULENC <br />GREEN RIVER, WY <br />Operation of the hydroelectric system and the western <br />area power grid-interacts specifically with the Jim Bridger <br />power plant, affecting local taxes and jobs. In the larger <br />picture, the move to restrict hydro operation's traditional <br />role as a supplier of peak power demand is going to mag- <br />nify other power generation (coal especially) demands and <br />attendant environmental trade offs. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.