My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05149
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05149
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:17:10 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:53:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8180.800
Description
Purgatoire River Project
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
9/1/1949
Author
RJ Tipton
Title
Engineering Report on Flood Control and Irrigation District with Particular Reference to the Piedmont Bridge Dam and Reservoir Site
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />("") <br />en in order to provide flood protection for Trinidad, Colorado, and <br />C.Jl <br />\~ u:' at the same time make more water readily available for agricul- <br />I <br /> <br />tural and industrial uses." Five reservoir plans, sununarized <br /> <br />J. <br /> <br />in Table No.1, were reported on. <br /> <br />Table No.1 <br /> <br />General Data on Plans Investigated by Corps of Engineers <br /> <br />i <br />1 <br />I <br /> <br />l~ <br /> <br />i"")" <br />....~. <br />~t2 <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Pl&n <br />-- <br /> <br />Reservoir <br />Capaci ty Total <br />in Acre- Es tima ted Annual Annual <br />feet Cost Cost !lene.u.t~ <br />---- <br />28,400 (a) $6,684,590 $337,390 :;; 32,250 <br /> <br />Ratio of <br />Costs to <br />Benefi ts <br /> <br />Sopris Detention <br />Ree. Plan 1. <br /> <br />l: .0$6 <br /> <br />Sopris Detention <br />Res. Plan 2. 5,200 <br /> <br />2,)10,481 42l,047 <br /> <br />1: .005 <br /> <br />Piedmont Bridge <br />Detention Res. 31,500 <br /> <br />5,333,247 280,210 <br /> <br />32,250 <br /> <br />l: .115 <br /> <br />Piedmont Bridge (b) <br />Retention Res. 81,500 <br /> <br />l4,699,262 663,809 357,003(d) <br /> <br />1: .529 <br /> <br />Piedmont Bridge <br />Retention Ree. (c) 8l,500 <br /> <br />l4,699,262 <br /> <br />l: .7 <br /> <br />, <br />l' <br />~ <br />... <br /> <br />(a) Limit of economical storage <br />(b) For flood control and irrigation <br />(c) Primarily for irl'iGa tion, incidental flood control <br />(d) Flood benefits $73,642: Irrieation benefits $283,361. <br /> <br />It is readily apparent thIJ.t the only reserVoir plan listed <br /> <br /> <br />above which is worthy of consideration is the Piedmont Bridge <br /> <br />Retention Reservoir; therefore, only that reserVoir will be con- <br /> <br />, ~ <br />! <br />I <br />! <br />, . <br />I <br />! <br /> <br />sidered herein. The Piedmont 3ridge Retention Reservoir as' <br /> <br />studied by the Corps of Engineers had a capacity of 81,500 acre- <br /> <br />feet. Two studies were made of a reservoir of that capacity. <br /> <br />The first had the capacity allocated as follows: <br /> <br />-8- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.