My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP05120
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP05120
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:17:03 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:52:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.760
Description
Yampa River General
State
CO
Basin
Yampa/White
Water Division
6
Date
1/1/1983
Author
USGS
Title
Reservoir Development Impacts on Surface-Water Quantity and Quality in the Yampa River Basin - Colorado and Wyoming - 1983
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
106
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br />Irrigation water was one of the larger proposed uses of the reservoir waters. The <br />waters apportioned for irrigation uses were allotted during the growing season <br />(Apri I through October) as summarized in table 7, and a majority of the control- <br />point diversions and thei r approximate locations are shown in figure 6. For each <br />Irrigation-diversion amount, 67 percent of the diverted water was assumed to be <br />returned to the stream system at some point downstream, and 33 percent was assumed <br />to be consumptively used by plants, evapotranspi,red, or lost by seepage into the <br />ground (Colorado Water Conservation Board and U.S. Department of Agricuiture, <br />1969). Because of the large number involved, most return-flow control points are <br />not shown in figure 6. <br /> <br />Table 6.--Selsated proposed reservoir uses and approximate locations <br /> <br />[Use: I, irrigation; P, power; R, recreation; D, domestic; <br />M, municipal; N, industrial. Modified from Steele and others, 1979) <br /> <br />Proposed reservoir <br /> <br />Bear----------------------- <br />Cross Mountain------------- <br />Juniper-------------------- <br />Yamcolo-------------------- <br />Blacktail------------------ <br /> <br />Childress------------------ <br />Lower Green Creek---------- <br />Lower Middle Creek--------- <br />Upper Middle Creek--------- <br />Pot Hook------------------- <br /> <br />Sandstone------------------ <br />California Park------------ <br />Craig---------------------- <br />Dunckley------------------- <br />Grouse Mountain------------ <br /> <br />Hinman Park---------------- <br />PI easant Va Ii ey------------ <br /> <br />Stream <br /> <br />Yampa River------------- <br />Yampa River------------- <br />Yampa River------------- <br />Bear River-------------- <br />Yampa River------------- <br /> <br />Trout Creek------------- <br />Green Creek----------~-- <br />Middle Creek------------ <br />Middle Creek------------ <br />Slater Fork------------- <br /> <br />Savery Creek------------ <br />Elkhead Creek----------- <br />Yampa River------------- <br />Fish Creek-------------- <br />Wi 1 low Creek------------ " <br /> <br />Elk Rlver--------------- <br />Yampa River------------- <br /> <br />Proposed <br />uses <br /> <br />Location <br />(township, <br />range) <br /> <br />4N-84W <br />6N-98W <br />6N-94W <br />IN-8.6W <br />4N-84W <br /> <br />4N-86w <br />4N-84W <br />5N-86W <br />5N-86W <br />12N-89W <br /> <br />13N-89W <br />9N-87W <br />6N-92W <br />4N-87W <br />9N-85W <br /> <br />9N-84W <br />5N-84W <br /> <br />, <br />P,I,R <br />P,' ,R <br />, ,N,D <br />P <br /> <br />M,N,D <br />P <br />P,N <br />P,N <br />, <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />N,D <br />, ,D <br />R,N <br /> <br />P,N <br />R, I <br /> <br />A summary of assumed industrial and municipal diversions is given in table 8 <br />and control-point locations are illustrated in figure 6. The net consumption of <br />water used for municipal purposes was assumed to be one-third, whereas industriai <br />users were assumed to consumptively use all water diverted. The amount of water <br />required for wet-tower cooling systems in coal-fired electric.power generation <br />plants Was adapted from computations from Palmer and others (1977). The approxi- <br />mate water required for wet-tower cool ing is 27,000 acre-feet (33.3 hm3) for each <br />2,000 megawatts of electricity generated, or a constant flow rate of 37 ft3/s <br />(1.04 m3/s) per 2,000 megawatts. The proposed Oak Creek electrical-generation <br /> <br />19 <br /> <br />~ <br />" <br /> <br />;~ <br />~, <br /> <br />;~ <br /> <br />...... <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.