My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04999
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
5001-6000
>
WSP04999
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:16:30 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:47:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8054
Description
Water Salvage
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
6/1/1975
Author
Utah Water Research
Title
Water Salvage Potentials in Utah - Volume II - Evaporation Suppression by Reservoir Destratification
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~y~g1.0 <br /> <br />SUPPRESSION WITH COOLED EV APORA TION PANS <br /> <br />Use of historic enporadOD data <br /> <br />One possible source of verification for the <br />suppression/temperature function in the model <br />which was investigated during the initial phase of <br />this research was the analysis of historic Utah pan <br />evaporation data. The approach was to divide the <br />daily dala into several discrete categories. each of <br />which had nearly equal wind measurements. The <br />data used included daily evaporation. maximum <br />and minimum air temperature. and daily total <br />wind. <br /> <br />The intent was to eliminate wind as a variable <br />by segregating the data according to wind (5 mph <br />increments). However. since humidity measure. <br />roents were not available. there was no way of <br />eliminating humidity as a variable. Regression <br />analysis of the data produced very poor correlation. <br />The correlation between evaporation and average <br />air temperature yeilded R' values as high as .80 on <br />two wind categories but most RZ values wefe less <br />than .60. <br /> <br />The possible reasons for the large amount of <br />noise in the data are numerous. They include: <br /> <br />J. Ignoring differences in humidity of the <br /> <br />air. <br /> <br />2. Using air temperatures instead of water <br />temperatures for daily data. <br /> <br />3. Measurement and other errors inherent in <br />pan operations. <br /> <br />The inadequate results of this attempt to use <br />existing climatological data to verify the model <br />clearly demonstrated the need for a controlled <br />evaporation experiment during which evaporation <br />is measured simultaneously at pans which have <br />different water temperatures but with other <br />parameters such as wind and humidity being <br />identical. The balance of this section is devoted to <br />such an experiment. <br /> <br />Experiment design <br /> <br />In order to empirically determine evaporation <br />change as a function of water temperature change <br />only. the experiment was designed with evapora- <br />tion pans at different water temperatures but at the <br />same location so that identical wind and humidity <br />conditions were acting upon each pan. Three <br />evaporation pans were used at the station; two of <br />the pans were cooled by running water through <br />coils beneath the water surface. The third pan <br />had no temperature control; it was a normal <br />evaporation pan serving as a standard reference. <br />Air and water temperatures, dew point, precipita- <br />tion and wind were all recorded. Temperature and <br />dew point readings were recorded every 20 minutes. <br />Total wind. precipitation and evaporation were <br />recorded once a day. This phase of the research is <br />described in detail in an M.S. Thesis by James <br />Frankiewicz (1975) which is summarized here. <br /> <br />EnporadoD pans <br /> <br />General: The evaporation pans were con- <br />structed according to U.S. Weather Bureau Class <br />"A" pan specifications. Two pans were then fitted <br />with a concentric spiral shaped from I-inch <br />diameter aluminum tubing. The spiral. situated <br />approximately 2 inches up from the bottom. circled <br />from the pan edge into the center. The tubing was <br />connected to hose couplings mounted through the <br />sides of the pan. <br /> <br />Pan cooUog: The municipal water system <br />supplied a steady flow of constant temperature <br />water at approximately 9.50C for cooling the north <br />and center pans. The water was transported to the <br />pans through an insulated hose. Gate valves were <br />installed on the pan inlet couplings; the valves were <br />used to regulate the flow through the tubing and <br />the resultant cooling of the pans. A high flow rate <br />was maintained through the coils in the center pan <br />and a lower flow rate was used in the north pan. <br />The cooling water was taken from a connection on <br />the opposite side of the pan and into a nearby <br />drain. <br /> <br />15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.