My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04958
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04958
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:16:19 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:46:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.300.40
Description
Colorado River Compact
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
8/1/1997
Author
Daniel Tyler
Title
Delpheus Emory Carpenter and the Colorado River Compact of 1922
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />38 <br /> <br />believing instead that "Arizona's delay indicated that the Compact would <br />never be ratified and, therefore, the Federal Power Commission would be at <br />liberty to proceed without awaiting further ratiication by the states. ,,109 <br />Carpenter was also concerned about events in Arizona, although he <br />consistently stated his belief that Arizona would ratity the Compact ifIeft <br />alone to do so. Governor George W. P. Hunt had been elected to a second <br />term in the falI of 1924. Hunt was an outspoken opponent of the Compact and <br />he had "insisted that the Compact should not be in effect until the three lower <br />states had entered into a separate agreement among themselves, requesting the <br />use of the water alIocated to those states in block by the Colorado River <br />Compact.,,11O Hunt's opposition and the apparent lack of pro-Compact <br />leadership in Arizona prompted Carpenter to suggest to Hoover and others <br />that "it might be well for the six states, which had already ratified, to take <br />legislative action, making the Compact effective when ratified by six ill ~ <br />[states], thereby leaving the field open to Arizona to enter at her leisure. ,,111 <br />As historian Norris Hundley, jr. has concluded, "[t]he state of Colorado <br />took the lead in trying to find a solution to the problem.',1I2 Governor William <br />E. Sweet authorized an investigation into the possibility of suing Arizona in <br />the Supreme Court. Fred S. Caldwell, Colorado's Assistant Attorney General, <br />enthusiasticalIy endorsed this approach. With the assistance of Denver's own <br />1. Ward Bannister, a man who frequently controverted Carpenter's plans and <br />policies, he planned to file suit with Colorado as the the lead plaintiff. 113 <br />Carpenter bristled. He felt that Arizona had acted neither for nor against the <br />Compact. That state, he claimed, was entitled to ample time to make her own <br />decisions. The very object of the Compact, he told Sweet, was to avoid <br />litigation. CaldwelI was a "crusader," never satisfied unless he was involved <br />in a quarrel and someone "who has made a failure of everything he <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.