My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04955
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04955
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:16:19 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:46:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.116.M
Description
Fruitland Mesa Project
State
CO
Basin
Gunnison
Water Division
4
Date
11/1/1980
Author
CWCB
Title
Fruitland Mesa Project - November 1980
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Project Overview
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />federal reclamation project would be feasible. PRC Engineering <br /> <br /> <br />Consultants, Inc., prepared the feasibility study, which study <br /> <br /> <br />was co-funded by the CWCB. It was completed in October, 1980. <br /> <br />PROBLEM <br /> <br />The irrigators in the district are consistently faced with <br />water shortages during the latter part of each water season. On <br />an annual basis the shortage is approximately 33 percent for the <br />6,310 acres currently being irrigated in the study area. Part of <br />this shortage could be eliminated by re-routing the existing <br />water supplies. However, to reduce the shortage by over 50 <br />percent would require increasing the storage capacity of the <br />existing Gould Reservoir. <br /> <br />CURRENT STATUS <br /> <br />In order to eliminate most of the current shortages, one of <br /> <br /> <br />two alternatives costing either $4,350,000 or $6,680,000 would be <br /> <br /> <br />required. The lower cost (Case I) alternative would reduce <br /> <br /> <br />current shortages by 69 percent, whereas the higher cost (Case <br /> <br /> <br />II) alternative would reduce them by 80 percent. <br /> <br />Both of the alternatives would increase the capacity of <br />Gould Reservoir from the present 8,000 acre-feet to 12,000 <br />acre-feet. In addition, both alternatives would include <br />construction of certain new diversion and control structures. <br /> <br />-2- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.