Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />o <br />--J <br />o <br />CJ (2) Antidegradation Policy <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />In addition to the question of classification of water <br />bodies as a Class I or II high quality water, there is also <br />a question of the level of protection afforded under the <br />current State Antidegradation Policy (See Table 1.3). The <br />current State Antidegradation Standard for Class II High <br />Quality Waters permits degradation to the minimum level of <br />water quality to support designated uses if the State finds <br />that it will allow necessary and iustifiable economic <br />development. The federal criteria to permit such <br />degradation by comparison is "that allowing lower water <br />quality is necessary to accommodate important economic or <br />social development in the area in which the waters are <br />located." The appropriate test is whether degradation of <br />water quality is necessary to permit economic growth and <br />development, not whether economic growth and development is <br />necessary. Therefore, it is recommended that the federal <br />definition and standards for anti degradation be adopted for <br />waters in the Region as defined in Table 1.4. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />(3) Chronic and Acute Toxicity <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Adoption of both acute and chronic toxicity limits for water <br />quality levels necessary to protect aquatic life are <br />recommended to be adopted in accordance with the <br />Environmental Protection Agency's July 29, 1985 Notice of <br />Availability of Water Quality Criteria. These criteria are <br />designed to protect aquatic life from adverse impacts due to <br />both chronic and acute exposure to ammonia, arsenic, <br />cadmium, chlorine, chromium, copper, cyanide,lead, and <br />mercury. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />(4) Special Water Quality Standards <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Water quality standards for nutrient levels in Green <br />Mountain Reservoir are recommended to be adopted following <br />the completion of a detailed analysis of the lake's trophic <br />status and factors contributing to lake eutrophication. <br />Such an analysis should be at the same level of detail as <br />that performed for Dillon Reservoir under the Dillon Clean <br />Lakes Study which led to the adoption of water quality <br />standards for phosphorus in Dillon Reservoir. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />. -'\0-- <br /> <br /> <br />,".-~'-",-;-: "-, <br />- - ,'-'""",' - -~ ,""-, -- <br />