My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04900
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04900
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:16:06 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:44:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8272.800
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control program - Interested Parties - NWCCOG
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
12/1/1986
Author
NWCCOG
Title
Northwest Colorado Council of Governments -Areawide Water Quality Management Plan for Eagle - Grand - Jackson - Pitkin - Routt and Summitt Counties CO - revised December 1986 - VOLUME II - POLICY PLAN
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />o <br />--J <br />o <br />CJ (2) Antidegradation Policy <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />In addition to the question of classification of water <br />bodies as a Class I or II high quality water, there is also <br />a question of the level of protection afforded under the <br />current State Antidegradation Policy (See Table 1.3). The <br />current State Antidegradation Standard for Class II High <br />Quality Waters permits degradation to the minimum level of <br />water quality to support designated uses if the State finds <br />that it will allow necessary and iustifiable economic <br />development. The federal criteria to permit such <br />degradation by comparison is "that allowing lower water <br />quality is necessary to accommodate important economic or <br />social development in the area in which the waters are <br />located." The appropriate test is whether degradation of <br />water quality is necessary to permit economic growth and <br />development, not whether economic growth and development is <br />necessary. Therefore, it is recommended that the federal <br />definition and standards for anti degradation be adopted for <br />waters in the Region as defined in Table 1.4. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />(3) Chronic and Acute Toxicity <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Adoption of both acute and chronic toxicity limits for water <br />quality levels necessary to protect aquatic life are <br />recommended to be adopted in accordance with the <br />Environmental Protection Agency's July 29, 1985 Notice of <br />Availability of Water Quality Criteria. These criteria are <br />designed to protect aquatic life from adverse impacts due to <br />both chronic and acute exposure to ammonia, arsenic, <br />cadmium, chlorine, chromium, copper, cyanide,lead, and <br />mercury. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />(4) Special Water Quality Standards <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Water quality standards for nutrient levels in Green <br />Mountain Reservoir are recommended to be adopted following <br />the completion of a detailed analysis of the lake's trophic <br />status and factors contributing to lake eutrophication. <br />Such an analysis should be at the same level of detail as <br />that performed for Dillon Reservoir under the Dillon Clean <br />Lakes Study which led to the adoption of water quality <br />standards for phosphorus in Dillon Reservoir. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />. -'\0-- <br /> <br /> <br />,".-~'-",-;-: "-, <br />- - ,'-'""",' - -~ ,""-, -- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.