My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04893
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04893
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:16:05 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:44:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8143
Description
John Martin Reservoir
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
9/27/1963
Title
News Articles/Press Releases -- September 27 1963 - April 4 1985
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
News Article/Press Release
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />c.::> Arkansas River and Tributaries above John Martin Dam, Colorado <br />-0--- - <br /> <br />______________ ~-f:f <br /> <br />c.:> <br />,.. <br />N <br />Q:) <br /> <br />The Board concurred in the need for a careful study of the environmental <br /> <br />aspects of any plan of improvement proposed for the Arkansas River from <br /> <br />Pueblo to Las Animas. It concludes, however, that such studies should be <br /> <br />made prior to authorization of the prorect:. The two primary reasons for the <br /> <br />Board's conclusion were: (a) Significant adverse environmental impacts <br /> <br />would probably result in a Board recommendation that the channelization <br /> <br />project not be authorized. It is considered important therefore that the <br /> <br />Board have the results of the environmental impact study available for review <br /> <br />:.::-....,..., <br />. ....;.~.,.~ <br />:<.~.S::: <br /> <br />prior to considering the overall merits of the proposed improvements; and <br /> <br />(b) Authorization of the channelization project would focus the environmental <br /> <br />studies on the impact of the channelization plan; and the Board believed that <br /> <br />there is a need to reevaluate the problems and needs along the main stem of <br /> <br />the Arkansas Ri~er considering all possible structural and nonstructural alterna- <br /> <br />tives without the potential prejudice toward an authorized plan of improvement. <br /> <br />The Board further noted that the proposed channelization includes a reach <br /> <br />(designated as reach 2 - urban) that would provide flood protection for the city <br /> <br />of La Junta. This local protection project is well justified economically and <br /> <br />can be constructed with or without the remainder of the channelization project. <br /> <br />The potential for adverse environmental impacts within this urban teach Is believed <br /> <br />to be small. The Board, therefore, concluded that authorization and construc- <br /> <br />tion of the local protection project at La Junta should not be deferred because <br /> <br />of the environmental impact study. The benefit-cost ratio for the improvement <br /> <br />is l. 6. <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />.:".ol:':", .' <br />", <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.