Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, ,.... ,-. '7 <br />li..J. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />One alternative plan for reducing the contribution of salinity <br />of Las Vegas Wash Groundwater consists of groundwater interception <br />facility, delivery pipeline, pumping plant, evaporation pond, and <br />surface flow bypass system. 'I'his solar evaporation plan is estimated <br />to reduce the salt contribution of the wash by 1)1,000 tons annually. <br /> <br />The groundwater flow, which surfaces at a narrow point in the <br />wash, would be collected in a series of subsurface drains and pumped <br />4 miles to evaporation ponds, comprising some 2,)00 acres in the <br />vicinity of Henderson. I~aximum annual evaporation, which is expected <br />to be reached in the year 2000, will be about 15,000 af/yr. <br /> <br />The treated effluent from the municipal treatment facilities, <br />which has a much lower salinity than the groundwater, would be <br />collected, bypassed around the area of rising groundwater, and <br />allowed to discharge into Lake Mead. <br /> <br />Implementation of the project will reduce salinity of the water <br />to downstream users. The ~rash is highly valued as a recreational <br />and wildlife habitat area. Continued return of treated effluents <br />will maintain year-round flow of the wash below the area of rising <br />ground water. <br /> <br />The estimated cost of the proposed salinity reduction program <br />is $49.1: million vlith an annual operation, maintenance and replace- <br />ment cost of $200,000. Total capital costs, including interest <br />during construction, ~lOuld be $5L,., 700, 000, and the annual costs, <br />based on amortizing the capital costs at 6 7/8 percent interest <br />over 100 years, \vould be $l" 000, 000. The removal of 1)1,000 tons <br />a year of salt from the river would reduce the river's salinity at <br />Imperial Dam by I) ppm. <br /> <br />In another alternative, the collected groundwater flows would <br />be directed by the drains to a main sump where they would be pumped <br />to a reverse osmosis desalting' plant. The -product stream of vlater <br />~ith a salinity of 500 mg/l would be returned to the Vash, and the <br />brine stream would be delivered to a disposal pond for evaporation. <br />\nth a brine dischare;e of about 1,900 af/yr, about 28) acres of ponds <br />w)uld be required to evaporate the brine waters. This alternative <br />WGuld remove about 1)8,000 tons of salt per year from the salt load <br />discharged by the Hash to Lake Mead. <br /> <br />A third alternative calls for disposal of the collected ~round- <br />'vater flows in Dry Lake, a playa, northeast of Las Vegas. Joint use <br />of the proposed pipeline to convey effluent from the waste treatment <br />plant near Las Vegas to the Allen Power Project for power plant <br />cooling is proposed. <br /> <br />Colorado River Water Quality <br />Standards <br /> <br />Lynn M. Thatcher, Chairman of the Colorado River Basin Salinity <br />Control Forum, sent a letter dated November 26, 197), to ~~. Paul <br /> <br />- 19 - <br />