My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04772
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04772
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:15:33 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:38:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8281.300
Description
Colorado River Studies and Investigations - Colorado River Consumptive Uses and Losses Report
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
4/4/1991
Title
Upper Colorado River Commission Staff Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />~ <br /> <br /><:~) <br /> <br />.'::> a tI'8.nsbasin diversion, not for water that may be generated or <br />foot arithmetically "found." If that were true, the Upper Basin should <br />...:J be similady credited with water in reaches of the tributaries that <br />"""" realize a net gain in flow. I reconunend that we object to the <br />reported channel loss as reported. <br /> <br />The greatest improvement in the new draft Uses and Losses Report is <br />the inclusion of a more complete, and easily understood, Technical <br />Appendix for the Upper Basin. Unfortunately, data from the Lower <br />Basin were not detailed in an appendix. The Lower Colorado River <br />Region relied heavily on the reported accounting for Article V of <br />Arizona v. California. Unfortunately, these data are not inclusive <br />of all uses in the Lower Basin. I have suggested that this problem <br />be rectified ~n the 1986-1990 Uses and Losses Report. <br /> <br />The new draft Uses and Losses <br />original draft. Al though I see <br />Commission member States are still <br />this updated analysis be forwarded <br />Engineering Commi ttee for their use. <br /> <br />Report is much better than the <br />no major problem with it, the <br />reviewing it. I suggest that <br />to the states and members of the <br /> <br />Attachments <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />i <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.