Laserfiche WebLink
<br />40 <br /> <br /> <br />vistas of natural lakes, deciduous woodlands, rolling prairies, and <br />prairie marshes provide a stark contrast to the surrounding agw <br />ricultural lands in the valleys of the James, Big Sioux, and Mis- <br />souri Rivers. Downstream, especially in Missouri, there is the <br />diversity of land forms and terrestrial ecosystems that include <br />cliffs, springs, caves, subterranean waters, oxbow lakes along <br />streams, tall grass prairies, oak-hickory forests and flood plain <br />forests. Several of these natural features served as guideposts <br />for the explorers and settlers who established the historic trails <br />that began in or traversed the Basin, generally along the rivers. <br />The proposed Lewis and Clark National Historic Trail involves <br />lands and streams throughout much of the Basin. <br /> <br />Conflicts of interest over resource use and management <br />sometimes arise. For example, in the South Dakota badlands, <br />difficulties may be encountered in attempting to preserve land <br />forms that are natural producers of large volumes of sediment. <br />Also, areas proposed for wild, scenic, or recreational river desig- <br />nation preclude future development not compatible with such <br />designation. <br /> <br />Cultural resources are distributed throughout the Basin <br />and are often closely associated with water areas. Proposed <br />water projects studies have uncovered historical and cultural <br />vaiues linked with old mines, trails, white settlements, and paleo- <br />or prehistoric Indian cultures. <br /> <br />Directions <br /> <br />Preservation, restoration, or improvement of the water- <br />associated natural, historic, and cultural features should be an <br /> <br />integral element in all levels of planning for future water resource <br />management in the Basin. To achieve this objective, adequate <br />funding is required to properly inventory through a systemized <br />program of data collection the archaeologicai, paleontological, <br />natural, and historic features of the Basin, coordinate the public <br />and private efforts, and appraise the quality and quantity of the <br />information. <br /> <br />Support of those programs to monitor natural. historic and <br />cultural features that are subjected to potential damage or com- <br />plete loss by erosion, or possible disturbance and ruination by <br />construction and general use are strongly advocated to preserve <br />meaningful remnants of the history of the Basin. <br /> <br />Power and Energy Development <br /> <br />Situation Statement <br /> <br />By the end of 1974, there were about 400 electric generat- <br />ing plants located within the Missouri River Basin with an installed <br />capacity of nearly 22,000 megawatts and a net generation capa- <br />bility of nearly 86 million megawatthours. Conventional fossil- <br />fueled steam-electric plants furnish 73 percent of the total energy <br />generated, hydroelectric plants produce 20 percent, and nuclear, <br />diesel, and combustion turbine plants generate the remaining 7 <br />percent. <br /> <br />Projected electric generating capacity needs for the year <br />2000 in the Basin range from three to five times the 1973 demand. <br /> <br />