Laserfiche WebLink
<br />t)'J: ;'l.;) <br />_I, _ ~ _: J. _ <br /> <br />Goals should be established to provide direction for <br />effective planning. Plans then should lead to implementation <br />action. In this country, goals leading to action have guided our <br />way in the past. "Independence," "Open the West," and "Put a <br />Man on the Moon," are goals Americans have set and achieved. <br /> <br />National goals and policies for water and related land <br />resources management have been established through legisla- <br />tion, administrative action, and the efforts of various commissions. <br />and water resource conferences. Regional goals for the man- <br />agement of water and related land resources in this Basin are in <br />the process of being developed and will be more sharply iden- <br />tified through the continuous planning process undertaken by the <br />Missouri River Basin Commission in concert with its member <br />States, Federal agencies, and others affected. <br /> <br />National Water Resources <br />Management Goals and Policies <br /> <br />The development of a national policy which would coordi- <br />nate the various water policies and programs of the Federal <br />agencies and the State governments in a more comprehensive <br />way had its beginning in the administration of Theodore <br />Roosevelt. A February 1908 report of the Inland Waterways <br />Commission recommended that Federal, State and local inter- <br />ests cooperate in achieving solutions to water problems. <br /> <br />A report by the Presidential Advisory Committee on Water <br />Resources Policy, issued in December 1955, contained the fol- <br />lowing statement: <br /> <br />The greatest single weakness in the Federal Govern- <br />ment's activities in the field of water resources develop- <br />ment is the lack of cooperation and coordination of the <br />Federal agencies with each other and with the States and <br />local interests. <br /> <br />A Senate Select Committee on National Water Re- <br />sources in preparing its report in 1959-1961 found essentially <br />the same weakness and further recommended that the "Fed- <br />eral Government should stimulate more active participation by <br />the States in planning and undertaking water development and <br />management activities." <br /> <br />COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING POLICY <br /> <br />The Water Resources Planning Act of 1965 (Public Law <br />89-80) was first proposed in 1961 to provide for "the optimum <br />development of the Nation's natural resources through the coor- <br /> <br />CHAPTER 4 <br />DIRECTIONS FOR THE FUTURE <br /> <br />dinated planning of water and related land resources, through the <br />establishment of a water resources council and river basin com- <br />missions, and by providing financial assistance to the States in <br />order to increase State participation in such planning." <br /> <br />With final passage of the 1965 Act, it became national <br />policy "to encourage the conservation, development, and utiliza- <br />tion of water and related land resources of the United States on a <br />comprehensive and coordinated basis by the Federal Govem- <br />ment, States, localities, and private enterprise wijh the coopera- <br />tion of all affected Federal agencies, States, local governments, <br />individuals, corporations, business enterprises, and others con- <br />cerned." While the Water Resources Planning Act of 1965 did not <br />change or supersede then existing authority or responsibility for <br />water resources planning, development, or control by Federal <br />agencies and officials or as provided for by interstate compacts or <br />other similar arrangements, it did establish for the first time a <br />national policy which mandated a comprehensive, coordinated, <br />joint State-Federal planning approach which would greatly en- <br />hance the opportunity for the optimized utilization of the Nation's <br />water and related land resources. <br /> <br />Implementation ofthis national policy for the Federal Gov- <br />ernment is being achieved through the activities and programs of <br />the U.S. Water Resources Council, as authorized under Hie I of <br />the Act. The Council has been instrumental in assisting the States <br />to develop capability and to participate in water planning through <br />its grant program. Each State has developed its own institutional <br />framework for resource planning, and has prepared or is in the <br />process of preparing a State water plan. Six river basin commis- <br />sions involving 32 States have been established to foster com- <br />prehenSIve, coordinated, regional planning. To encourage con- <br />sistency among Federal water programs and projects, principles <br />and standards have been promulgated, and policy recom- <br />mendations have been sent to the President regarding cost shar- <br />ing and flood plain management. A water assessment and ap- <br />praisal program has been established to bring together results of <br />the Council's National Water Assessment, the river basin com- <br />missions' coordinated plans, and data on Federal programs and <br />projects into a comprehensive program not previously available <br />for simultaneously evaluating the Nation's water resource needs <br />and the adequacy of Federal programs and policies. <br /> <br />OTHER DIRECTIVES <br /> <br />In addition to the steps taken through the U.S. Water <br />Resources Council to respond to the national goals, actions by <br />others have also focused on these goals. The National Water <br />Commission report, "Water Policies for the Future," expounded <br /> <br />33 <br /> <br />