Laserfiche WebLink
<br />...... <br />C-') <br /> <br />1. Need or desire for the inclusion/elimination of a <br />Rehabilitation & Betterment loan as a form of cost <br />sharing or "buying down" the cost effectiveness of some <br />component(s)? <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />...... <br /> <br />2. preliminary selection of components of the LGBU <br />authorized plan which should be recommended for <br />construction in the final SO/JU Study report. <br /> <br />~.. <br /> <br />3. Finalization of the desired type and format of the <br />study report and need for a separate pre-construction <br />report, to move into the construction phase. Initial <br />discussions regarding the reports to be produced at the <br />conclusion of the SO/JU Study identified a R&B report <br />which could be routed through the R&B approval process <br />and a supplemental report detailing the salinity <br />control aspects which could be used to obtain an <br />appropriation of salinity control funding. <br /> <br />4. Guidance is also needed on if and how the report <br />should be integrated with NEPA documentation. <br />Discussions have indicated that the changes in design <br />and the controversial nature of the impacts <br />necessitates a re-evaluation of the analyses contained <br />in the FR/FEIS. Current thoughts are that the <br />documentation can be "tiered" to the FEIS using an EA . <br />with a FONSI. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />22 <br />