My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04698
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04698
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 2:15:12 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:31:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8273.100
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control - Federal Agencies - Bureau of Reclamation
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
5/22/1992
Author
BOR
Title
Uncompahgre Project SO-JU Study
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />l-' <br />Co') <br />uu <br />~ <br /> <br />III. HYDROSALINITY ANALYSIS <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />A. Modifications To Previous Analysis <br /> <br />The revised hydrosalinity analysis undertaken as part of the <br />Study involved the following modifications to information ' <br />originally presented in Appendix B (Hydrosalinity) of the FR/EIS: <br /> <br />1. Appendix B displayed the seepage and salinity <br />reduction effects of the LGBU based on a 6 month period <br />allocated to irrigation use and another 6 months <br />allocated to winter water use. Upon review of'the <br />UVWUA's diversion records, the 'length of the period for <br />calculating the effects of lining/piping was changed to <br />7 months to correspond to diversions which normally <br />begin by April 1 and end on or after November 1. This <br />is believed to give a more accurate representaiion of - <br />the actual project cond~tions and the,relative value,of <br />lining versus the removal of winter water. 'The effects <br />of the winter water component are now based on removing <br />water from the system over a 5 month winter period. <br /> <br />2. Seepage volumes were modified to reflect the use of <br />piped laterals, pvc membrane canal lining, and some <br />cases of reduced system lengths due to shortened <br />alignments and/or the combining of some laterals (see ~ <br />section II-B.). <br /> <br />3. The five deferred canal system components were <br />broken into 5 individual canal components and 5, <br />individual lateral components. Seepage reductions and <br />resulting salinity reductions were computed for each of <br />these 10 components. ' ' <br /> <br />4. Analyses in Appendix B were based on 232 miles of <br />canals and laterals rather than the 252 miles in <br />existence on the east side of the River. The revised <br />analysis used 252 miles. <br /> <br />5. Appendix B analyses also were based on the <br />assumption that winter water was carried in all canals <br />and laterals on the east side. Current information <br />indicates that only 407 miles of the total 552 ~iles of <br />canals and laterals currently carry winter water. The <br />revised analysis assumes winter water is carried in 160 <br />miles on the east side of the river and 247 miles on <br />the west side. <br /> <br />Results of the revised analysis show a shift of salinity <br />reduction benefits from the winter Water component to the east <br />side lining and piping components. The total salinity reduction .. <br />due to Winter Water would be 40,570 tons per year, while the . <br /> <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.