Laserfiche WebLink
<br />('\J <br />'\;11 <br />;".'\") <br />.,.-i <br /> <br /> <br />c..:. <br /> <br />1:->; RrI'LY <br />RHIR TO: <br /> <br />Colorado Water Conservation Board <br />823 State Centennial Building <br />1313 S~erman Street <br />Denver, C6lorado 80203 <br />ATTN: J. William McDonald, Secretary <br /> <br />United States Department of the Intcrlll!- <br /> <br />BUREAU OF RECLAMA TION <br /> <br />SAN LUIS \' ULEY PROJECT <br />715 SIATH STRlET - BOX 44. <br />ALAMOSA. COWRADO 81101 <br /> <br />'SEP 2 2 1982 <br /> <br /> <br />Dear Sirs: <br /> <br />In October the Bureau of Reclamation will be asking for concurrence for the start <br />of Stage 3 construction from the Rio Grande Water Conservation District and the <br />State of Colorado Water Conservation Board, as required by Section 101 (b) of Public <br />Law 92-514 (86 Stat. 964), the authorizing legislation, .as amended by Public Law <br />96-375 (94 Stat. 1507). <br /> <br />. Our plan of development provides for stage development of project features over <br />an 8 year period and provides assurance to local and State of Colorado interests <br />that pumping of the shallow ground water will not adversely affect ground water <br />conditions in the valley. <br /> <br />The Definite Plan Report, page B-6, gives a range, 13,000 to 23,000 acre-feet per <br />year, ground water yield estimate for Stage 1-2. Completion of salvage wells in <br />Stage 1-2 showed that this stage will produce about 14.000 acre-feet per year. <br /> <br />Our well spacing model and Geologic survey's computer model shows pumping at this <br />rate will not violate any boundary conditions as required by the amended legislation. <br /> <br />Based on water samples from the salvage well drilling program in Stage 1-2, un- <br />confined ground water has a combined mixed total dissolved solids content of 149 <br />parts per million (ppm) and a combined mixed sodium ion concentration of 30 percent <br />of the total positive ions. This water quality is well within Article III of the <br />Rio Grande Compact requirements. <br /> <br />Regulation of standards promulgated pursuant to the 1965 Water Quality Act are <br />administered by the concerned states and overSeen by the Environmental Protection <br />Agency. <br /> <br />The Denver Engineering and Research technical water quality staff reviewed the <br />"Classification and Numeric Standards" proposed by the Colorado State Health <br />Department Water Quality Control Commission. The Denver technical staff concluded <br />that if the water sampled is representative of water to be salvaged and discharged <br />into the Rio Grande. the blended water should meet all the pertinent numeric criteria. <br /> <br />The Project Office is analyzing. water from Stage 1-2 for trace elements. e.g., <br />cadmium, copper, lead, mercury, silver, and iron and have found no violations to <br />Colorado's numeric standards. <br /> <br />Our specifications design exploration data indicated a thin membrane lining would <br />be the most economical approach for the canal. This membrane lining would reduce <br />channel leakage and water quality problems that could arise from an unlined channel. <br />