Laserfiche WebLink
<br />/ <br />Rapid ,/ <br />/ <br />/ <br />/ <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />HISTORICAL AND FORECASTED POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT <br /> <br /> <br />800.000 <br /> <br />600.000 <br /> <br />400.000 <br /> <br />200.000 <br /> <br />o <br />1940 <br /> <br />1950 <br /> <br />1960 <br /> <br />FIGURE 5 <br /> <br />Understanding the variations in the <br />alternative forecasts may be best <br />achieved by examining the components of <br />population growth. Table 8 presents <br />figures on these components, including: <br />natural increase, migration and military <br />change. <br /> <br />NA TURAl INCREASE <br /> <br />Natural increase has a major impact on <br />population growth. Since survival rates <br />are held canstant in the alternatives, the <br />variation in the number of deaths results <br />entirely from differences in population <br />sizes to which the rates are applied. <br />Birth rates, on the other hand, vary <br />between the two forecasts because of <br />assumed differences in demographic <br />trends which affect fertility. These <br />variations range from a replacement level <br />2.1 children per woman at completion of <br />childbearing for the slow growth <br />alternative to 2.6 children per woman for <br /> <br />/ <br />/ <br />/ <br /> <br />/ <br />/ <br />/ <br />/ <br />/ <br />/ <br />/ <br /> <br />/ <br /> <br />Slow __ <br />----- <br /> <br />",," --- <br />'" --- <br /><!.-- <br /> <br />Rapilt............. <br />-- <br />-- <br /> <br />-- <br />-- <br /> <br />--~'!.!'--- <br /> <br />EMPlOY ENT <br /> <br />-:..-:"- ------- <br /> <br />190 <br /> <br />1980 <br /> <br />2000 <br /> <br />1990 <br /> <br />the rapid growth forecast. Overall, <br />natural increase is expected to account <br />for 91 % of population change for slow <br />growth, declining to 32% under the rapid <br />growth scenario. <br /> <br />MIGRA TION <br /> <br />Employment-related migration is <br />expected to have a greater influence on <br />population growth in the future. There is <br />a close relationship between total <br />population growth and employment- <br />related migration in the alternative <br />forecasts. Nonmilitary employment in- <br />migration into the community accounts <br />far only 22% of population growth using <br />the slow growth forecast and 60% for the <br />rapid growth alternative. Expansion in <br />the basic employment sector of the <br />economy is expected to outpace growth in <br />the local labor force, thus creating new <br />jobs to be filled. It is estimated that such <br />new employment, over and above growth <br /> <br />23 <br />