Laserfiche WebLink
<br />economic institutions if the old ones (:3n be made to <br />function a while longer; to have a conservative outlook <br />on money matters; and to insist upon maintaining rather <br />large physical and monetary reserves. <br />The drought proved rather conclusively that some <br />farming methods imported to the frontier were not <br />suited to the environment of the basin, particularly the <br />plains portion. Economic hardships of the drought <br />undoubtedly speeded acceptance of a large number of <br />agricultural innovations which thereafter came into <br />widespread use. During the "thirties" and early <br />"forlies," the tractor almost completely replaced the <br />horse as the farm power ullit, the combine made the <br />threshing machine obsolete, and the introduction of <br />several farm implements such as the disc plow made it <br />feasible to apply stubble mulching and other dry-land <br />farming methods to large acreages. Irrigation. spurred by <br />more efticient equipment and methods, increased <br />throughout the great plains and moved eastward into the <br />traditional corn-belt areas. With the advent of modern <br />farm machinery, the small acreage subsistence farm has <br />largely been replaced by the large commercial Dperation. <br />The generally concurrent drought and depression <br />were instrumental in bringing about important changes <br />in agricultural land use. During the settlement period, <br />the land use emphasis had been on exploitation of the <br />soil resources. Dust storms of the 1930's proved that this <br />was a situation which neither the basin nor the Nation <br />could afford. The result was a number of governmental <br />programs which provided economic incentives and <br />technical assistance for soil and water conservtltion. <br />Perhtlps more important, the agriculturalists tlnd <br />residents at large came to realize that maintenance of the <br />soil resources and the fullest practicable water usage was <br />in their best interests. <br /> <br />'- <br /> <br />'.- <br /> <br /> <br />Fallowland Strip Farming Conserves Limited Soil <br />Moisture for Crops <br /> <br />26 <br /> <br />Further, the 1930's made the NatiDIl aware of the <br />morc seriDus economic and social problems within <br />agriculture. For the first time in its history, the Federal <br />Government initiated progr:.tms to diredly control <br />agricultur:.tl production. to deal with surpluses. to try to <br />increase and stabilize the incDmes of rural families. and <br />to make rural life easier. <br />The total effect of the adoption of better farming <br />methods, specialization, better land use. and. the govern- <br />mental programs was a revolution in agriculture. 10\31 <br />production climbed dramatically, the efliciency ur a <br />single farmer increased markedly. and many of the <br />hardships of rural life disappeared. In fact. electrification <br />of the rural areas through the REA's, the advent of <br />modern communications, and the improvcment of trans. <br />portation have been of tremendous importance in <br />allowing the rural people to partake of goods ilnd <br />seJVices enjoyed by the rest of society. <br />The 1930's accelerated an out-migration of the rural <br />population. Basin cDunties as <t whole probably had their <br />greatest rural population about J 930, and h<lve since <br />shown :1 rather steady decline. <br />'f the fmnt\er was thought of as a safety nive for <br />migration of the eastern populations during the setlle- <br />menl period, the cities of the Nation can be thought of <br />as being a safety valve for the rural population out- <br />migratiDn since the 1930's. The vast majority of the <br />population leaving the basin's farms has migrated to <br />cities located both within and outside the b3sin. Few <br />have bel.:omc farmers in other areas. In some instances <br />the urban areas have provided the out-migrants with a <br />better standard of living and greater opportunities for a <br />livelihood_ <br />A decreasing population is not necessarily an inherent <br />disadvantage, but the sparse rural population within <br />much of the basin has been, and is now at a point where <br />it is too small to support many of the commonly <br />accepted institutional patterns. The decreasing rural <br />population has strained the physical and I1nancial <br />strength of such institution:s as churches, schools, and <br />local governmental units. <br />It is not easy to measure the extent of the sDcial costs <br />of space, but there is nD doubt that they exist. Many of <br />the costs occur in the form of subsidies made by local, <br />State, and Federal Governments. In contfilst with rural <br />.problems of decreasing population are the problems <br />arising from Dut-migratiDn to congested urban areas. <br />Rural electrification and the RFD are ex.amples where <br />other segments of the population provjde a subsidy for <br />their services in the sparsely settled 3reas. Other <br />mDunting social costs are not always apparent currently. <br />but become evident with lime. Inadequ,lte schooling <br />may not be apparent until college entrance examinatiDns <br />are taken. The costs of maintaining a two-dwelling <br />household for school purposes, one on the farm and the <br />other in town, represent a higher social cost of space <br />