My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04601
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04601
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:56:16 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:27:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8277.400.10
Description
Las Vegas Wash Unit- Nevada
State
NV
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
2/28/1984
Title
Las Vegas Wash Unit CRBSCP NEVADA - Planning Progress - February 1984
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />..-f <br />00 <br />N <br />N <br />c.- <br />O <br /> <br />DRAFT LC-732 <br />February 28, 1984 <br /> <br />LAS VEGAS WASH UNIT <br />CRBSCP, NEVADA <br />GROUND-WATER FLOW REDUCTION <br />GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT FEATURES <br /> <br />Ground-water flow reduction is to be accomplished by the placement of a <br />system of underground walls extending from bedrock to a few feet above the <br />ground surface. These walls are typically formed with a slurry mixture <br />which fills an excavated trench. <br /> <br />The relatively impermeable underground slurry walls would be placed along <br />the south side of the Wash to block tributary ground-water inflow to the <br />Wash. Although the slurry walls would reduce subsurface ground water flow, <br />triubutary inflow would continue as less dense brackish surface water. <br />Detention basins would help retard the tributary brackish surface water as <br />it flows parallel to, but separated from, the sewage effluent flow on the <br />north side of the Wash. High flows of fresh storm runoff filling any basin <br />would spill across to the north side of the Wash. Thus, the detention <br />basins would not be managed like evaporation ponds to completely contain <br />all inflow, but only serve to help attentuate fluctuations in tributary <br />inflow. <br /> <br />The evapotranspiration capacity of the existing vegetated areas within <br />the proposed detention basins is expected to exceed the annual average <br />tributary inflow. However, the flushing action of intermittant storm <br />runoff is expected to continue to maintain near surface salinity <br />levels tolerable to the vegetation. In effect, minimal changes in existing <br />vegetated or inundated land area is expected within the detention basin <br />system. In some areas more salt tolerant plants may replace existing <br />cattails. The system would be conducive to management (if desired) for a <br />diversity of vegetative communities. Existing wetlands on the north side <br />of the Wash would be unprotected by the detention basin system and subject <br />to drainage by natural erosive processes. <br /> <br />A set of two surge ponds would be formed by floodplain excavation, dikes, <br />and slurry walls to provide surge capacity for attenuation of peak storm <br />runoff. The normal water surface of 14.5 acres for both ponds is expected <br />to be maintained by effluent from the city and county sewage treatment <br />plants. Above Pabco Road, approximately 55 acres of floodplain currently <br />inundated by sewage treatment plant effluent would be seperated from the <br />effluent flow by the slurry wall system and utilized for ground-water <br />detention. Approximately 10 miles of slurry wall may be built in the next <br />3 years. The salinity control effectiveness of the system would be <br />monitered as construction proceeds to help estimate the potential <br />effectiveness of further construction. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.