Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />o <br />00 <br />N <br />C\l <br />o <br />o <br /> <br />DRAFT LC-732 <br />February 28, 1984 <br /> <br />LAS VEGAS WASH UNIT <br />CRBSCP, NEVADA <br />PLANNING PROGRESS <br />February 1984 <br /> <br />An October 1982 Status Report (released December 1982) presented <br />recent study findin9s and a recommended salinity control strategy for <br />Las Vegas Wash (Wash). The major finding of the study was that the <br />salt loading is induced by the disposal of waste water into unlined <br />wasteways or basins, and the seepage leaches salt from the underlying <br />evaporite deposits. Salinity control may be realized by preventing <br />ground water recharge from waste-water seepage by using a pipeline or <br />channel to convey the waste-water downstream of areas subject to <br />significant salt leaching. <br /> <br />Reclamation has begun a verification program in the Pittman area which <br />would monitor the ground water response to the elimination of waste <br />water seepage from unlined ditches. Installation of a 3.5-mile <br />Pittman Bypass Pipeline is scheduled to begin in March 1984 with <br />completion of the pipeline in October 1984. <br /> <br />An Environmental Assessment Report for the Pittman Verification <br />Program was completed, and Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) <br />was signed in May, 1983. The Environmental Assessment Report <br />documented the insignificant impact of the 3.5-mile pipeline to convey <br />surface waters past saline soils. This report also outlines the <br />concept of a Vegetation Test Site which would determine and <br />demonstrate the feasibility of establishing and maintaining native <br />vegetation with available ground water. <br /> <br />An effort is being made to coordinate planning of further salinity <br />control action with plans of county and municipal governments. <br />Several local entities have expressed opposition against a Bypass <br />Channel proposed in the 1982 Status Report. The primary issues appear <br />to be: (1) the possible impacts the Bypass Channel would have on the <br />existing and proposed wetlands environment in the Wash, and (2) the <br />possible increased sewage treatment costs resulting from reduction of <br />treatment capability of the Wash. Other issues relate to the cost and <br />benefits of the salinity control project. <br /> <br />In response to local issues and recent changes in the location of salt <br />pickup by the surface stream flow, another salinity control strategy <br />has been identified which would reduce salt pickup by reducing <br />ground-water flow. Development of the ground-water flow reduction <br />strategy began in November 1983, with discussions of the concept with <br />state and local government agencies and advisory groups. Local <br />response has been relatively positive, primarily because sewage <br />treatment plant effluent would not be diverted from the Wash flood <br />plain. If the ground-water flow reduction action proves successful, a <br />Bypass Channel would no longer be needed. <br />