My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04587
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04587
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:56:12 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:26:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8271.200
Description
Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Program - Development and History - UCRB 13a Assessment
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
11/3/1977
Title
Review of Initial Energy Supply and Demand Data Provided by Federal Agencies for Use in the WRC 13a Assessments
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />o <br />.~ As indicated, the results reported in the previous sub-section <br />rv <br />. refer to the October 18, 1976 version of the forecast--a version <br />"hich was not finalized when relased to WRC for this study. The <br /> <br />II.2. The Current Version of Forecast 2 for 2000 <br /> <br />current version of the forecast for the year 2000 contains significant <br /> <br />differences when compared to its predecessor. The major deviations <br /> <br />in the current version (see Figure II.4) relative to the earlier <br /> <br />forecast are explained by: <br /> <br />1. Greater resource savings due to price and/or policy <br /> <br />induced end-use efficiency improvements; <br /> <br />2. Increased waste heat utilization; <br /> <br />3. Greater market penetration of total energy systems; <br />4. Lower aggregate electricity demand; <br />5. More oil and less electricity going to residential and <br /> <br />commercial space heat; <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />6.' Less coal liquid and. gaseous synthetics; <br /> <br /> <br />7.~ Slightly more (less) coal fired (nuclear) capacity; <br /> <br />8. More oil imports; <br /> <br />9. More oil shale production; <br /> <br />10. Lower total coal production. <br />In view of these changes and ignoring the time constraints <br />imposed by the WRC study requirements, a logical question arises <br /> <br />concerning the continued use of the earlier version of Forecast 2 <br /> <br />as part of the 1975 National Assessment. In response to this <br />question, it is suggested that the October 1976 scenario offers <br />a more analytically interesting energy future with respett to <br /> <br />potential water impacts than does the newer version. The rationale <br /> <br /> <br />for this statement results from an examination of the differences <br /> <br />. enumerated above. The lesser amounts of "efficiency improvement" <br />conservation, waste heat utilization, and penetration of total <br /> <br />-5- <br /> <br />-----.. <br /> <br />-,,- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.