Laserfiche WebLink
<br />'* 6. Assumptions used in the ERDA Forecast 2 Scenario are (as extracted <br />from the draft report): <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />11.1. The Basic Premises for Forecast 2 Case Identification <br /> <br />A detailed description of the as:;umptive frameHork in which <br /> <br />~ ERDA's planning, analysis, and evaluation is performed appears in <br />-..J <br />~ Reference 6. In this sub-section, we abstract from that report <br />~ <br /> <br />the foundational considerations which serve to identify Forecast 2. <br /> <br />These include: <br /> <br />1. A moderate success ra te for new energy technolo g ie s. <br /> <br />ERDA has developed a success prof~le for a selected set <br />of new energy technologies. These profiles (one for each <br /> <br />technology) contain an early, medium term, and late entry <br /> <br />date (year) for commercialization and low, medium, and <br /> <br />high upper bounds on commercial operation. The ERDA Fore- <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />cast 2 scenario pairs the medium entry date and medium <br /> <br />development profiles (See Appendix I and Reference 6, pp. <br /> <br />-0; <br /> <br />14-37) ; <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />2. Moderate energy conservation. <br /> <br />ERDA has established a strawman ". k <br />Wea Conservation" energy <br />demand schedule wh h <br />ic assumes that conservation POlicies <br />are not enacted and that . <br />energy pr~ce elasticities are <br />.only marginally operat;ve. Th F Z f <br />~ e orecast inal energy <br />demands result from price induced demand <br />curtailments <br />(~RI/BNL price elasticities are fully operative) and <br />policy induced end-use efficiency improvements. The <br /> <br />Forecast 2 end-use energy demand reductions (and associated <br />resource-supply-savings) relative to the "Weak Conservation" <br />schedule result in the d' <br />me lum conservation schedule de- <br /> <br />picted in Table 11.1; <br /> <br />-3- <br />