Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />1 <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />o <br />~ <br />c:J1.. <br />W <br /> <br />-35- <br /> <br />these lands from crop production. Private sector land <br />retirement through water transfers reduces the agricultural <br />consumptive use although the net consumptive use of the <br />river system is only slightly affected. An added benefit <br />for salinity control is thClt these "retired" lands are <br />usually marginal and the most inefficiently irrigated. <br />In the case of energy development and in many other <br />industries, the transferred water is generally totally <br />consumed on-site, therefore, the salinity detriments are <br />limited to concentrating effects due to the reduced amount <br />of water available for dilution. The high salt loading <br />component from the irrigated lands is eliminated. <br />Stora~e <br />There is more than 5.2 x 105 ha-m of storage available <br />in the upper Colorado River Basin. Table 1-3 in Appendix 1 <br />lists the major irrigation and power reservoirs. However, <br />there are a great many livestock water retention, recrea- <br />tional and municipal reservoirs, which are not listed. Most <br />of the unlisted reservoirs and lakes are very small, although <br />some, such as Dillon Reservoir (Denver, Colorado, municipal <br />water supply) are quite large. As of 1965, Shafer (1971) <br />indicated a total of 208 reservoirs with an active capacity <br />of 403,540 ha-m had been constructed. Since then the amount <br />of storage capacity has been increased by more than 100,000 <br />ha-m through the completion of Navajo, Curecanti and other <br />projects. <br /> <br />.. <br />