My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04519
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04519
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:55:50 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:24:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
7630.285
Description
Wild and Scenic - General
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
5/22/1978
Author
US GAO
Title
Federal Protection and Preservation of Wild and Scenic Rivers is Slow and Costly - By the Comptroller General - Report to the Congress of the United States
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />000470 <br /> <br />suitability for inclusion into the national wild and scenic <br />rivers system. A variety of problems are responsible for <br />most river studies not meeting their targ~t completion dates. <br />The result has been that the Congress, reluctant to act <br />before studies are completed, has designated few additional <br />rivers into the national system since 1968. During the <br />lengthy study period, the wild and scenic values of rivers <br />deteriorate, acquisition costs increase significantly, and <br />proposed projects are held in abeyance causing planning con- <br />fusion and increased costs. We believe inadequate manag~- <br />ment commitment and control by the BureaU of Outdoor Recrea- <br />tion and the Forest Servic~ has been responsible for the <br />variety of recurring delays which plague most studies and <br />that specific management changes by the two study agencies <br />can greatly expedite future studies. <br /> <br />States are nut participating in development of a <br />national wild and scenic river system, as intended, and the <br />secretarial designation process for adding State-protected <br />rivers to the national system is little used. t1any Stdtes <br />view national designation as disadvantageous and are reluc- <br />tant to seek national designation of State rivers d~e to con- <br />cern about their a~llity to fund the development and <br />administrative costs of ~ n~tional river. State partici- <br />pation in development 0f the national system has been fur- <br />ther curtailed by a Department of t:,e Interior ruling that <br />States cannot nomina~e rivers bordered by substAntial blocks <br />of Federal lands. <br /> <br />I <br />~ <br />~ <br />~ <br /> <br />RECOMMENDATIONS TO ^GENCT~~ <br /> <br />~ <br />~ <br /> <br />We recommend that the Secretaries of the Interior and <br />Agriculture req~ire the Director of the Bureau of Outdoor <br />Recreation and the Chief of the Forest Service to improve <br />the timeliness of ri.~r studies by <br /> <br />--starting river studies as soon as possible after <br />studies are authorized, <br /> <br />--developing guideli~es on how to conduct river <br />studies, <br /> <br />--keeping track of how the studi~s are progressing <br />and haloing study teams to schedules, <br /> <br />--u~ing experienced personnel to conduct studies, <br /> <br />i: <br /> <br />--combining environmental impact studies and river <br />studies, and <br /> <br />I <br />, <br />!. <br /> <br />20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.