My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04463
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04463
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:55:35 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:22:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8460.500
Description
Platte River Recovery Plan
Basin
South Platte
Date
6/1/1997
Author
Colo Div of Wildlife
Title
Inventory and Status of South Platte River Native Fishes in Colorado
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
178
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />The tributary system of the Big Thompson River was sampled at 140 locations (Table 23). <br />Eighty-six of those locations were dry, and an additional 26 wet sites contained no fish. <br />Approximately half of the 28 locations where fish were found were within the Little Thompson <br />River drainage. Sampling efficiency was good throughout the drainage with the exceptions of <br />several of the Little Thompson sites where irrigation returns kept the water turbid throughout the <br />sampling period. <br /> <br />Fathead minnow, longnose dace, and creek chub dominated the tributary collection, <br />comprising 81 percent of the catch. Johnny darter and white sucker provided an additional 14 <br />percent. The remaining 4 percent of the sample consisted mostly of sand shiner, carp, brown <br />trout and rainbow trout (Table 24). Longnose sucker, central stoneroller, green sunfish, plains <br />topminnow, yellow perch, and pumpkinseed sunfish were found in trace numbers. Approximately <br />8 percent of the fish sampled were uncommon or environmentally-sensitive species. Introduced <br />species accounted for 2 percent of the collections. <br /> <br />The most notable difference between the mainstem results and the tributary fish <br />populations is the virtual absence of central stoneroller in the tributaries. This species is sensitive <br />to water quality degradation and excessive siltation. The stoneroller was the most abundant fish <br />taken in mainstem sampling (Table 22). The number of species found per site was generally lower <br />throughout the tributaries compared to mainstem sites. <br /> <br />37 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.