Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />The tributary system of the Big Thompson River was sampled at 140 locations (Table 23). <br />Eighty-six of those locations were dry, and an additional 26 wet sites contained no fish. <br />Approximately half of the 28 locations where fish were found were within the Little Thompson <br />River drainage. Sampling efficiency was good throughout the drainage with the exceptions of <br />several of the Little Thompson sites where irrigation returns kept the water turbid throughout the <br />sampling period. <br /> <br />Fathead minnow, longnose dace, and creek chub dominated the tributary collection, <br />comprising 81 percent of the catch. Johnny darter and white sucker provided an additional 14 <br />percent. The remaining 4 percent of the sample consisted mostly of sand shiner, carp, brown <br />trout and rainbow trout (Table 24). Longnose sucker, central stoneroller, green sunfish, plains <br />topminnow, yellow perch, and pumpkinseed sunfish were found in trace numbers. Approximately <br />8 percent of the fish sampled were uncommon or environmentally-sensitive species. Introduced <br />species accounted for 2 percent of the collections. <br /> <br />The most notable difference between the mainstem results and the tributary fish <br />populations is the virtual absence of central stoneroller in the tributaries. This species is sensitive <br />to water quality degradation and excessive siltation. The stoneroller was the most abundant fish <br />taken in mainstem sampling (Table 22). The number of species found per site was generally lower <br />throughout the tributaries compared to mainstem sites. <br /> <br />37 <br />