My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04463
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04463
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:55:35 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:22:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8460.500
Description
Platte River Recovery Plan
Basin
South Platte
Date
6/1/1997
Author
Colo Div of Wildlife
Title
Inventory and Status of South Platte River Native Fishes in Colorado
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
178
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />BIG THOMPSON RIVER DRAINAGE - HYDROUNfT 10190006 <br />The Big Thompson River drainage originates in'Rocky Mountain National Park and ends <br />where the Big Thompson River flows into the South Platte River near LaSa1\e, Colorado. The <br />entire drainage covers 830 square miles. This sampling included transition zone and plains <br />portions of this drainage (approx. 25% of the total draijlage). . <br />, <br />, <br />! <br />Most of the land-use in the sampling area consi$ts of irrigated cropland and pasture, but <br />the heavily populated Front Range urban corridor including the city of Loveland influences the <br />water flow and quality at the mid-reaches of the sampli,rig area. The upstream area drains rocky <br />clay soils, which blend into fertile silt-loams in the lower reaches. <br /> <br />The results from this sampling are stratified into information from the mainstem Big <br />Thompson River from near the mouth of the Big Thompson Canyon to its confluence with the <br />South Platte, and all tributaries from the foothi1\s eastward. This was done because there are <br />typically large differences in fish species and relative a~undance between mainstem populations <br />and tributary populations, and because the collection sizes on the mainstem sites would dominate <br />lumped data and mask any differences. . <br /> <br />Twelve sites were sampled on the mainstem Big Thompson River during 1994 (Table 21). <br />CDOW crews conducted complete sampling at eight sites, and used fish capture data from four <br />additional Colorado State University (CSU) biomonit6ring survey sites. Sampling conditions <br />were only fair due to higher flows than are considered! optimum; however, the relatively clear <br />water suggested sampling was reasonably effective, a~ few fish were known to have escaped past <br />the electrical fields. . <br /> <br />When compared to either the Cache la Poudre River to the north, or the St. Vrain River to <br />the south, the Big Thompson River is lacking in species diversity and numbers offish. An average <br />of 131 fish per sample site were captured, whereas th", St. Vrain River yielded 336 fish per site <br />and the Poudre River produced 999 fish from an aver~ge sample. <br /> <br />The three most common species (central ston~ro1\er, creek chub and longnose dace) made <br />up 76 percent of the total catch (Table 22). White sucker added 7.5 percent, and brown trout <br />(from the uppermost stations) added another 4.5 percent. These five species accounted for 87 <br />percent of the entire catch. Johnny darter, sand shiner, longnose sucker, fathead minnow and <br />yellow perch ranged from 1 to 2 percent in abundance, with mosquitofish, black crappie, green <br />sunfish, and gizzard shad each providing 13 to 16 fisj1 or approximately 0.7 percent each. <br />Largemouth bass, Iowa darter, bigmouth shiner, common carp, plains topminnow, smallmouth <br />bass, and spottail shiner had fewer than 10 fish each (Table 22). <br /> <br />Uncommon or environmentally-sensitive species (in this case, stonero1\er, johnny darter, <br />Iowa darter, and plains topminnow) made up 29 percent of total collections which compare <br />favorably with other hydrounit co1\ections. Introduced species accounted for 7.3 percent of the <br />total, but brown trout from the uppermost stations on the river were responsible for 4.3 percent <br />, <br />alone. <br /> <br />36 i <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.