My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04401
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04401
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:55:18 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:18:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8141.100
Description
Fry-Ark
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Date
1/1/1951
Author
ARCA
Title
ARCA Resolutions and Minutes Relating to Fry-Ark Project
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Project Overview
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. } <br /> <br />( <br /> <br />( <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />1 6 <br /> <br />!' <br /> <br />rr NOI. BE IT RESOLVED by the Arkansas River Compact Administration that <br />the fOllowing comments and recommendations relating to said report of <br />the Secretary of Interior, to wit: <br /> <br />II 'The Arka:r\sas River Compact Administration submits these comments <br />and recommendations to the Governors of Colorado and Kansas re- <br />specting the proposed Initial Development, Gunnison-Arkansas Pro- <br />ject, Roaring Fork Diversion, Colorado, namely: <br /> <br />II '1. The Administration understands that the project plan proposes: <br /> <br />rr' (a) The importation by appropriate project works of ap- <br />proximately 70,000 acre-feet of water a year from the <br />Colorado rover Basin to the Arkansas River Basin for <br />supplemental irrigation and domestic water supplies <br />in Colorado and for the production of hydroelectric <br />energy. <br /> <br />"' (b) In connection with such importation of vlater and its <br />regulation in the nrkansas River Valley by project <br />works, the re-regulation of native waters of the <br />Arkansas River (the term 'native waters I, as herein <br />used, being those waters covered and defined by <br />Art. I1I-B of the Arkansas River Compact). <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />rr '2. The interstate water relations of Colorado and Kansas with <br />respect to the Arkansas River do not justify any objection <br />to the proposed project development for the importation of <br />Colorado hiver water (described in sub-paragraph (a) above). <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />II '3. The re-regulation of native waters of the Arka'1sas River <br />(native waters being as above mentioned) concerns the . <br />Arkansas River Compact Administration and both Colorado <br />and Kansas in complying with the provisions of the Arkan- <br />sas River Compact and maintaining the benefits and obli- <br />gations of the two states under that Compact. To that <br />end, it is recommended to the Governors of Colorado and <br />Kansas, and expressed as a policy of the Arkansas River <br />Compact Ad~inistration, that the Initial Development, <br />Gunnison-rlrkansas Project, Roaring Fork Diversion, Colo- <br />rado, as set forth in Project Planning Report No. 7-8a. <br />49-1 of the Bureau of Reclamation, be approved; pro- <br />vided, ho~ever, that there shall be no re-regulation of <br />native waters of the arkansas tliver as proposed in such <br />report until a plan of operation, rules, regulations, <br />procedures and agreements in furtherance thereof, in- <br />cluding any pertinent agreements between the Corps of <br />Engineers and the Bureau of Reclamation, shall have <br />been submitted to, and approved by, the Arkansas Ri- <br />ver Compact ndministration and the affected water <br />users. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.