Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />'MFlY-15-199S 15: 54 <br /> <br />BOR LI.LND <br /> <br />9706633212 P.1S/24 <br /> <br />17 <br /> <br />*Utahk Grand County: and Colorado. Mesa County. The Colorado River from <br />Blac Rocks (river mile I37) in T. 10 S., R. 104 W., section 25 <br />(6th Principal Meridian) to Fish Ford in T. 21 S., R. 24 E., section 3S <br />(Salt Lake Meridian). <br /> <br />*Utah. Garfield and San Juan Counties. The Colorado River from Brown Betty <br />Rapid in T. 30 S., R. 18 E., section 34 (Salt Lake Meridian) to Imperial <br />Canyon in T. 31 S., R. 17 E., section 28 (Salt Lake Meridian). <br /> <br />EFFECTS OF THE ACTION <br /> <br />Impoundments and diversions have reduced peak discharges by 48 percent since <br />I942, while increasing base flows by 21 percent in some reaches. These <br />alterations to the flow regime, along with a number of other factors, have <br />resulted in such drastic reductions in the populations of the Colorado <br />squawfish, humpback chub, bony tail, and razorback sucker that the Service has <br />listed these species as endangered and has implemented programs to prevent <br />them from becoming extinct. <br /> <br />Water depletions reduce the ability of the river to create and maintain <br />important native fish habitats. Food supply, predation, and competition are <br />important elements of the biological environment. Food supply is a function <br />of nutrient supply and productivity, which could be limited by reduction of <br />high spring flows brought about by water depletions. Predation and <br />competition from nonnative fish species have been identified as factors in the <br />decline of the endangered fishes. Water depletions contribute to alterations <br />in flow regimes that favor nonnative fishes. The Service concludes that water <br />depletions impact the primary constituent elements of designated critical <br />habitat. However, reasonable and prudent alternatives have been developed by <br />the Service that would avoid destruction or adverse modification to the <br />critical habitat. <br /> <br />REASONABLE AND PRUDENT ALTERNATIVES <br /> <br />On January 21-22, 1988, the Secretary of the Interior; the Governors of <br />Wyoming, Colorado, and Utah; and the Administrator of the Western Area Power <br />Administration were cosigners of a Cooperative Agreement to implement the <br />"Recovery Implementation Program for Endangered Fish Species in the Upper <br />Colorado River Basin" (Recovery Program) (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service <br />1987). An objective of the Recovery Program was to identify reasonable and <br />prudent alternatives that would ensure the survival and recovery of the listed <br />species while providing for new water development in the Upper Basin. <br /> <br />The following excerpts from the Recovery Program are pertinent to this <br />consultation because they summarize portions of the Recovery Program that <br />address depletion impacts, section 7 consultation, and project proponent <br />responsibilities: <br />