My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04354
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04354
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:55:03 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:17:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8102
Description
Arkansas River Hydrology
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
1/1/1997
Author
USGS
Title
Description of the Program Changes 1989 97 and a User Manual for a Transit Loss Accounting Program Applied to Fountain Creek Between Colorado Springs and the Arkansas River Colorado
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />OJiH34 <br /> <br />,,' <br /> <br />~) <br /> <br />Once initiated, the accounting program queries <br />the user for the required input data: (I) The TRF and <br />the native return-flow quantities discharged at the CCS <br />WWTF, (2) the discharge at each gaging station <br />(table I, fig. 3), and (3) \he diversion at each ditch <br />(table 1). These data are input manually to the <br />program for each day of transit-loss computations: <br />however, the diversion data, once input, only need to <br />be reentered when the diversions change from the <br />previous day. All input data, \he accounting program <br />computations, and the output results are expressed in <br />cubic feet per second, unless noted otherwise. <br /> <br />:." <br /> <br />Program Computations <br /> <br />'. <br />~; <br /> <br />In computing the estimated quantities of TRF in <br />Fountain Creek and the associated transit losses, the <br />accounting program uses two sets of computations. <br />The first set of computations is made between any two <br />adjacent gaging stations (stream-segment computa- <br />tions); these computations estimate the loss or gain in <br />NSF between the two adjacent gaging stations. The <br />second set of computations is made between any two <br />adjacent nodes (subreach computations); the actual <br />transit-loss computations are made in the subreach <br />computations, using the result from the stream- <br />segment computations. The stream-segment computa- <br />tions are completed for a stream segment, then the <br />subreach computations are completed for each <br />subreach within the stream segment. When the <br />subreach computations are completed for all <br />subreaches within a stream segment, \he stream- <br />segment computations are repeated for \he next stream <br />segment, followed again by the subreach computa- <br />tions; the process continues until computations are <br />completed downstream through subreach 14. <br /> <br />':. <br /> <br />.'; <br />., <br /> <br />:." <br /> <br />.:! <br /> <br />.; <br /> <br />Assumptions Used in the Computations <br /> <br />To compute estimated transit losses using the <br />accounting program, an assumption must be made in <br />the stream-segment computations that the quantity of <br />TRF at the downstream gaging station is the same as at <br />the upstream gaging station. This assumption is neces- <br />sary because, at this point in the computations, the <br />quantity of TRF at the downstream gaging station is <br />not known. Although this assumption results in some <br />error in estimating the loss or gain in NSF between the <br />gaging stations, these errors are not substantial (Kuhn, <br /> <br />1988, p. 88). Because of this assumption, the <br />computed quantity of NSF at the end of the down- <br />stream subreach within a stream segment is somewhat <br />different from the NSF at the beginning of \he next <br />stream-segment computations (see the "Program <br />Output" section, p. 12). This discrepancy in NSF <br />computation has been corrected in the program <br />version currently (1997) in use (see \he "Changes to <br />Program Output" section, p. 22). To perform the <br />transit-loss computations, the input data also are <br />assumed to be accurate. <br /> <br />Stream-Segment Computations <br /> <br />After the data are input, the accounting-program <br />computations begin wi\h the stream-segment compu- <br />tations, which are diagramed in figure 4. To perform <br />the stream-segment computations, the following <br />stream-segment known quantities (SS_Kx, where x is <br />a number) need to be defined: <br /> <br />I. SS_KI (fig. 4), which is the total streamflow at the <br />upstream gaging station. If the upstream gaging <br />station is station 07105500, then SS_KI is equal <br />to the sum of the daily mean discharge at station <br />07105500 and the total return flow (sum of TRF <br />and native return flow) discharged into Fountain <br />Creek at the CCS WWTF; otherwise, SS_KI is <br />equal to \he daily mean discharge at the upstream <br />gaging station. <br /> <br />2. SS_K2 (fig. 4), which is the TRF at the upstream <br />gaging station. If the upstream gaging station is <br />station 07105500, then SS_K2 is equal to the <br />TRF discharged at the CCS WWTF; otherwise, <br />SS_K2 is equal to SR_U3 (the TRF at the down- <br />stream node) from the last subreach computation <br />of the previous stream segment (see fig. 5 and the <br />"Subreach Computations" section, p. 9-12). <br /> <br />3. SS_K3 (fig. 4), which is the NSF at the upstream <br />gaging station. SS_K3 is equal to SS_KI ntinus <br />SS_K2. <br /> <br />4. SS_K4 (fig. 4), which is the total streamflow at the <br />downstream gaging station. SS_K4 is equal to <br />the daily mean discharge at the downstream <br />gaging station, <br /> <br />5. SS_K5 (fig. 4), which is the total NSF diversion in <br />the stream segment. The NSF diversions are <br />input individually for each ditch and the program <br /> <br />8 Descriptions of the Program Changes (1989-97) and a User Manual for a Transit-Loss Accounting Program <br />Applied to Fountain Creek Between Colorado Springs 8nd the Arkansas River, Colorado <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.