My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04331
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04331
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:54:56 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:17:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.112.A
Description
Dallas Creek Participating Project
State
CO
Basin
Gunnison
Water Division
4
Date
3/1/1977
Title
Dallas Creek Project
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Project Overview
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />;:", <br />- , <br /> <br />~'" <br />t"Ct,; ) <br />"{,'i.~;'~': <br /> <br />-" <br />" <br />'.~ <br /> <br />A series of alternative plans would have called for a second reservoir, <br /> <br />known as Dallas Divide, to be constructed on Pleasant Valley Creek. This <br /> <br />reservoir would have prOVided water for municipal and irrigation uses on <br /> <br />Log Hill Mesa. This increment was deleted from the p~oject plan when it <br /> <br />became apparent that the assumed municipal water needs would not material- <br /> <br />. <br />, <br /> <br />ize and oecause of environmental objections, <br /> <br />Another alternative would have utilized water for a coal fired <br /> <br />thermal generation plant in place of water for supplemental irrigation <br /> <br />in the Uncompahgre Valley. This alternative was not recommended at the <br /> <br />request of the State of Colorado which indicated a preferential use of <br /> <br />water for agriculture over energy development in the project area. <br /> <br />Finally, as an alternative to utilization of surplus water from the <br /> <br />Uncompahgre River, importation of additional water from the Gunnison River <br /> <br />through the Gunnison Tunnel was considered. During periods when the <br /> <br />tunnel was not being fully utilized for its present uses, water would be <br /> <br />conveyed from the Gunnison River for storage at the Dry Cedar Reservoir <br /> <br />on Dry Cedar Creek. This alternative could meet most of the Uncompahgre <br /> <br />Valley needs of the Dallas Creek Project but would not have served all <br /> <br />the project purposes as the proposed plan. Furthernore, it would have <br /> <br />critically limited the period of time available for maintenance of the <br /> <br />Gunnison Tunnel and could not take advantage of surplus flows of the <br /> <br />Uncompahgre River. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.