My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04326
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04326
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:54:54 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:17:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.105.I
Description
Colorado River-Water Projects-Navajo-Environmental Studies
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
4/8/2002
Title
Navajo Dam EIS-New Mexico Interstate Stream Commission Comments
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />.. . <br /> <br />Mr. Ken Beck <br />April 8, 2002 <br />Page 5 <br /> <br />contract rights for the purpose of leaving water in the river for endangered fish habitat. The <br />Commission does not believe that contractors for the Navajo Reservoir Supply need to share <br />water shortages that might be created by strict application of the flow recommendations. The <br />flow recommendations are not inviolate, and Reclamation must tind reasonable aiternatives. <br />While this discussion might be had in the DEIS, resolution of the issue may not be necessary for <br />many years until ful1 delivery demand occurs under the existing Navajo Reservoir Supply <br />contracts and hydrologic conditions combine with the ful1 demand to create an actual water <br />supply shortage. Further discussion of this issue may be had by the SJRBRIP Hydrology <br />Committee, which is charged with evaluating, in coordination with the Coordination Committee, <br />water rights issues pertinent to providing flows for endangered fish habitat. <br /> <br />In the meantime, the Commission does not believe that Reclamation is using the Nation's water <br />without its consent. Beneficial consumptive use is the limit to the right to use water, and the <br />Nation cannot now physically take delivery of the approximately 8,500 acre-feet annual contract <br />amount that is in question. Nor can the Nation require under the contract that Reclamation store <br />the water in Navajo Reservoir for use in future years. Until the Nation is ready to take delivery <br />of the amount of water in question, the corresponding portion of the Navajo Reservoir yield is <br />available for meeting other contract needs or endangered fish habitat needs. <br /> <br />Overall, the Commission believes that the preferred alternative allows progress to be made <br />towards meeting both goals of the SJRBRIP: to conserve populations of endangered fish species <br />in the San Juan River Basin consistent with recovery under the ESA and to proceed with water <br />development in the Basin in compliance with applicable laws and federal trust responsibilities to <br />the two Colorado Ute Tribes, the Navajo Nation and the Jicarilla Apache Nation. The SJRBRIP <br />is to provide the reasonable and prudent alternatives to allow further water development in the <br />San Juan River Basin to proceed in compliance with the ESA. Therefore, the Commission views <br />Reclamation as proposing a course of action that wil1lead to the Nation being able to receive and <br />use water in accordance with its Navajo Reservoir Supply water contract rights. <br /> <br />Please call me if discussion of these remarks would be helpful. <br /> <br />SinCerelY~ <br /> <br /> <br />~PPle <br />Staff Engineer <br /> <br />copy: Bob Krakow <br />Ron Bliesner <br />John Leeper <br />Mike Hamman <br />Randy Kirkpatrick <br />Paul Martin <br />Randy Seaholm <br />Steve Harris <br /> <br />00714 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.