My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04304
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04304
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:54:47 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:16:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8103.400
Description
Arkansas River Compact
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
4/4/1970
Author
Unknown
Title
A Recreation Pool for John Martin Reservoir
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />001472 <br /> <br />Uni'ceu S'ca"l:es Congress, for the purpose of equi'cably apportioning <br /> <br />the waters of 'the Arkansas Hiver which originate in Colorado <br /> <br />between the two st,ates. In general, wa'ter stored in the conserva- <br /> <br />tion pool may be released to the irrigators in each s"l:ate from <br /> <br />April 1 through October 31 each year.. The conservation pool has <br /> <br />been dry a:c times in fif'teEm of the past twen'ty years. <br /> <br />~ ohl}-1.~~L"c i~'....f:I,~~t~d B,E?2lms e 0 Lln'c,'?I s 'to. 'to_Con t,rQ,ver sy <br /> <br />Controversy was inevitable between Colorado and Kansas <br /> <br />because of rapid development of irrigation in the Arkansas Valley <br /> <br />and the nature of Colorado water law, the Doc'crine of Prior <br /> <br />. , 2 <br />AppJ:opn.atlon. <br /> <br />As early as 1891 KanGas claimed it was not getting an <br /> <br />equitable share of the river and in 1901 filed suit against <br /> <br />Colorado in the united S'cates Supreme Court asking relief from <br /> <br />injury. The Supreme Court's decision in 1907 was in Colorado's <br /> <br />favor, recognizing that, appropriation in Colorado had inflicted <br /> <br />perceptible injury in Kansas to portions of the Arkansas Valley, <br /> <br />while the \',hole of the Valley had suffered little, if any, and <br /> <br />benefits in reclc~ation of large areas of Colorado into fertile <br /> <br />_____._~..___a~_~__ <br /> <br />2The doctrine holds ,that.' (a) Water in its na'tural course is <br />public property; (b) a ves'ced righ,t to use the water may be <br />acquired by appropria'tion and application to beneficial use; <br />(c) the first person in t:imo 'co use the water is the first <br />person in righ,t; and (d) beneficial use is the measure and <br />the limit. of 'ill') right. <br /> <br />-2- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.