My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04208
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04208
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:54:15 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:12:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8276.851
Description
La Verkin Springs Unit - Colorado River Salinity Control Program
State
UT
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
3/23/1983
Title
LaVerkin Springs Desalinization Project
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />l[ <br /> <br />I <br />!! <br /> <br />totally evaporated (See Exhibit 1). The LaVerkin spring water <br />that is diverted will be replaced back into the Virgin River by <br /> <br />IE <br /> <br />the purchase of water stored in the Quail Creek Reservoir. <br /> <br />[! <br /> <br />To evaporate the entire flow of the springs, estimated at <br /> <br />I <br />If <br /> <br />11. 9 cfs (B, 600 AF per year)\ assuming 5.5 feet of net evapora- <br /> <br />tion per year per acre of surface area, requires over 1,550 <br /> <br />m <br /> <br />acres of land. Using the USGS topographic maps of the purga- <br /> <br />II <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />It <br /> <br />tory Flat area, all of the alternatives investigated had less <br /> <br />surface area than required. <br /> <br />There are physical features that <br /> <br />begin to increase the costs considerably as the surface area <br /> <br />increases over 1,000 acres. <br /> <br />The largest surface area identi- <br /> <br />IT <br /> <br />fied in the investigation had 1,220 acres while the most eco- <br /> <br />m <br /> <br />nomical evaporation pond size was approximately 1,025 acres. <br /> <br /> <br />Exhibit 1 outlines the facility layout for this alternative. <br /> <br />In <br /> <br />Even though it would be physically possible to increase <br /> <br />[H <br /> <br />the surface area to 1,550 acres, there appears to be a more <br /> <br /> <br />attractive, economical approach. All of the ponds investigated <br /> <br />averaged between 30 and 60 feet deep, resulting in a substan- <br /> <br />tial amount of storage capacity. <br /> <br />It would seem logical to <br /> <br />build the most economical size evaporation pond and plan on <br /> <br />providing storage for the remaining flow while investigating <br /> <br />potential future industrial uses of the water. <br /> <br />The evaporation pond alternative selected provides for <br /> <br />approximately 14 years of storage capacity. <br /> <br />If no uses of the <br /> <br />n <br />, . <br /> <br />002577 <br /> <br />n <br /> <br />P6/L3 <br /> <br />CREAMER AND NOBLE CfN..CONSULTlNG ENGINEERS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.