WSP04202 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

. e e 000190 91J Huerfano River QP at sec 5 - 28S - 72W; 100 yards upstream from the north section line (forest boundary) Amount: A CWCB instream flow recommendation needs to be made and would likely be deemed acceptable. In addition, USFS requests a high flow between May 1 and July 15 of at least 70% of bankfull and up to 120 % of bankfull to maintain habitat and move sediment in stream. Stream is badly eroded as the result of a dam failure in the past. 93D Dodgeton Creek QP at sec 4 - 31S - 69W; 200 yards upstream from the Cuchara Water intake Amount: A CWCB instream flow recommendation needs to be made and would likely be deemed acceptable. 93E White Creek QP at sec 35 - 30S - 69W; 100 yards upstream from the south section line (forest boundary) Amount: A CWCB instream flow of 3 cfs year round is acceptable at the QP. Nice dam site on this stream. 931 Baker Creek QP at sec 17 - 31S - 69W; 100 yards upstream from the ski area water rights in approximately the center of the section Amount: A CWCB instream flow recommendation needs to be made and would likely be deemed acceptable. 93J South Fork Baker Creek QP at sec 16 - 31S - 69W; 100 yards upstream from the forest boundary in approximately the center of the section Amount: A CWCB instream flow recommendation needs to be made and would likely be deemed acceptable. 93K Cucharas Creek QP at sec 22 - 31S - 69W; at the forest road Amount: A CWCB instream flow recommendation needs to be made and would likely be deemed acceptable. In addition, USFS requests a high flow between May I and July 15 of at least 70% of bankfull and up to 120 % of bankfull to maintain habitat and move sediments in stream, Group okay with this request as there are no private lands upstream of the QP, STATUS: The USFS needs to complete data collection on the 14(?) remaining streams for which no data to make recommendations from exists. Instream flow recommendations then need to be made by CDOW, in cooperation with USFS, on the 20 streams for which no recommendations currently exist. The USFS needs to provide a written summary of their high flow requests and the workgroup needs to meet, review these requests, and come to agreement on how the high flow requests should work and be administered so everyone has a clear understanding of how much water remains. The CWCB, CDOW and USFS need to agree on which streams have Greenback Cutthroat Trout in them as soon as possible. 8 " I .,~ d