My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04202
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04202
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:54:13 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:12:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8062.200
Description
Federal Reserved Water Rights - USFS - Water Division 2 - Negotiating Principles and Settlement
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
3/10/1997
Author
D Randolph Seaholm
Title
Technical Workgroup - Group 1 Stream Summary - March 10 1997
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />000189 <br /> <br />83B Porter Gulch (USFS will drop all claims) <br /> <br />84A Lake Creek <br />QP at sec 5 - 46N - 12E; 100 yards upstream of the Rainbow Trail Camp <br />Amount: A CWCB instream flow of 5 cfs year round is acceptable at the QP. <br /> <br />87B Newlin Creek <br />QP at sec 35 - 208 - 70W; 100 yards upstream of the private inho1dings (forest <br />boundary) <br />Amount: A CWCB instream flow recommendation needs to be made and would likely <br />be deemed acceptable, It was indicated that Greenback Cutthroat Trout may be <br />introduced to this stream, but there were none at present U8FS may want high flow <br />protection if this is going to occur. <br /> <br />87D Adobe Creek <br />QP at sec 12 - 218 - 70W; 100 yards upstream of the Florence diversion and private land <br />Amount: A CWCB instream flow recommendation needs to be made and would likely <br />be deemed acceptable. This watershed at the QP is very small (about 4 sq,mi.), and <br />USFS has agreed to consider further whether or not it is worth keeping this QP, <br /> <br />?? Oak Creek (USFS will drop all claims) <br /> <br />89A Middle Creek <br />QP at sec 6 - 238 - 68W; 100 yards upstream of the Beulah Water Works diversion <br />Amount: A CWCB instream flow recommendation needs to be made and would likely <br />be deemed acceptable, A considerable amount of upstream development exists in this <br />basin and it may be difficult to obtain an instream flow based on water availability, <br /> <br />?? Ophir Creek <br />QP at sec 9 - 238 - 69W; at confluence with Middle Creek <br />Amount: A CWCB instream flow of 1.5 cfs year round is acceptable at the QP. <br /> <br />89E St. Charles River <br />New QP at sec 12 - 248 - 69W; at the inlet to Lake Isabel <br />Amount: A CWCB instream flow of 3 cfs year round is acceptable but CDOW should <br />validate the recommendations at the QP given the reduced size of the watershed at the <br />new QP. <br /> <br />91A Bear Creek <br />New QP at sec 36 - 248 - 70W; 100 yards upstream from the west section line (forest <br />boundary) <br />Amount: A CWCB instream flow recommendation needs to be made and would likely <br />be deemed acceptable, <br /> <br />91C Turkey Creek <br />QP at sec 10 - 25S - 69W; 100 yards upstream from the south section line (forest <br />boundary) <br />Amount: A CWCB instream flow recommendation needs to be made and would likely <br />be deemed acceptable. <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />__Ii <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.