Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Presently 1.15 million acres of federally <br />controlled land and 225,000 acres of State <br />land in Boulder, Larimer, and Weld Counties <br />help fulfill the recreational needs of Front <br />Range dwellers. These national forests and <br />parks, wilderness areas, and State <br />recreation areas scattered throughout the <br />foothills and mountains also help ensure the <br />preservation of environmental quality. <br />Protecting existing natural preserves should <br />be of prime importance in Front Range <br />development. Also, acquisition of additional <br />open spaces and recreational areas, keeping <br />pace with the projected population growth, <br />should be a continuing objective. <br /> <br />Despite the widespread foreboding of <br />environmental degradation, future <br />development can be accomplished with <br />minimal adverse impacts. Land use planning <br />and application of controls would permit a <br />gradual, orderly transition and the <br />preservation of areas of environmental <br />quality. <br /> <br />COAL CREEK PROBLEMS <br /> <br />The earliest studies of the Coal Creek area <br />by the Bureau of Reclamation occurred in <br />the 1958-1959 period, and the "Report on <br />the South Platte River Basin, <br />Colorado-Wyoming-Nebraska" was issued in <br />July 1959. This report identified problems, <br />needs, and development potentials in the <br />entire South Platte River Basin, which <br />includes the Coal Creek area. A <br />reconnaissance investigation of the St. Vrain <br />Creek drainage area was made by the <br />Bureau of Reclamation in the 1964-1967 <br />period. This study identified critical water <br />problems in the Coal Creek area and <br />proposed a number of potential <br />developments to meet irrigation water <br />requirements. Studies conducted by the <br />Coal Creek Water and Sanitation Association <br />are discussed in Part IV. <br /> <br />The water resources of the Coal Creek Basin <br />are extremely limited since the stream <br /> <br />prOduces only about 3,000 acre-feet of <br />water annually. Present water users within <br />the basin are largely dependent on water <br />importations from nearby South Boulder <br />Creek, which produces an average annual <br />surface runoff of about 58,100 acre-feet. <br /> <br />Present population of the four communities <br />in the Coal Creek area, Erie, Lafayette, <br />Louisville, and Superior, is estimated to total <br />12,400 people. The Coal Creek Water and <br />Sanitation Association boundaries presently <br />encompass approximately 31,000 acres. <br />Local planners estimate a population of <br />50,000 people in the area by 1990. This <br />rapid population growth will require an <br />estimated annual water supply of 11,000 <br />acre-feet. <br /> <br />The Coal Creek area could be considered <br />part of the Boulder-Denver metropolitan <br />complex. Considerable pressure exists, and <br />will continue to exist, for almost complete <br />urbanization of this area. There is some <br />question whether irrigated agriculture will <br />continue as a viable economic sector within <br />the basin because of pressures to convert <br />irrigation water use to urban use. The <br />present water systems serving the four <br />communities are not adequate to meet the <br />water needs of the existing population and <br />the situation can only worsen with time. <br /> <br />lEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL <br />CONSI DERA TIONS <br /> <br />Colorado was the first state to adopt a pure <br />appropriation system, and the doctrine is <br />therefore known as the Colorado Doctrine. <br />This doctrine, as set forth in the State <br />constitution, declares that the <br />unappropriated water of every natural <br />stream is the property of the public, subject <br />to appropriation, and that the right to divert <br />unappropriated waters of any natural stream <br />for beneficial uses shall never be denied. The <br />constitution also provides that, as between <br />those using water for the same purpose, <br />priority of appropriation shall give the better <br /> <br />111-8 <br /> <br />