Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />-;1- <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />delivery and power production, would be investigated fully. This <br /> <br /> <br />meeting is certainly part of that process, Many of us, including <br /> <br /> <br />Secretary Ziglar, believed that the final report on the GCES <br /> <br /> <br />failed to adequately consider water delivery and power production, <br /> <br /> <br />and did not include adequate input from the Western Area power <br /> <br /> <br />Administration (WAPA). other public power interests and irrigators. <br /> <br />It is my belief that the current operation of Glen canyon <br /> <br />Dam should continue to be totally consistent with section 7 of the <br /> <br />Colorado River storage Project (CRSP) Act, which 1s replete with <br /> <br /> <br />references to the preeminence of the three primary authorized <br /> <br />purposes of the CRSP dams <br /> <br />for generation of power; water <br /> <br />storage to meet the terms oC basin state compacts; and use of the <br /> <br />water for agricultural and domestic purposes. <br /> <br />My purpose here, as it Was in my letters to Dr. <br /> <br /> <br />Marchant and Mr. Barrett, is to assert my position that the <br /> <br /> <br />assurances provided me and others in the June 1&, 1988 memo from <br /> <br />^s6istan~ Secretaries Ziglar and Bill Horn have not Changed, <br /> <br /> <br />Furthe.r, that there be an under..tanding throughout. the !lureau at <br /> <br /> <br />Reclamation that no final decisions will be made nor actions <br /> <br /> <br />taken to manipulate the flow of the river by changes in current <br /> <br />op~ration of the dam during the Phase II technical study and the <br /> <br /> <br />Phase III policy review, <br />