My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04127
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04127
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:53:53 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:10:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.101.09A
Description
Glen Canyon Dam/Lake Powell
State
AZ
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
2/1/1989
Author
BOR
Title
GCES Phase II and III Plan for Implementation and Addendum
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
EIS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />or no change, That means that environmental constituents will <br />not like the results, But is there any reference at all to "The <br />NEPAprocess will be initiated to determine the environmental <br />impact of no change in the operating criteria."? Phase II and <br />III are expected to be good enough for environmental <br />constituents, but if much change is indicated, it's not good <br />enough for the power interests--let's go to NEPA, <br /> <br />Fortunately page seven shows just where the Bureau of Reclamation <br />is coming from: If the Department"of Interior elects little or <br />no change, the basin states will likely concur. In your stated <br />assumption that the basin state representatives represent all <br />valid interests "including recreation and environment," then, <br />theoretically you have covered your legal mandate, But the <br />underlying assumption of comprehensive representation is <br />blatantly false. As I said walking away from our (Western River <br />Guides Association) meeting with Cliff Barrett last fall, "The <br />process is unacceptable because we don't have representation at <br />the bargaining table." Without beqqinq the question, just ask <br />any state governor specifically what interests are represented by <br />his basin state representative and the representative question <br />will be answered. Who are you trying to fool? Is it any <br />surprise that we are forced to seek a hearing before other <br />channels than administrative? <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br />4?~~ <br /> <br />Rob Elliott <br /> <br />cc: Jack Davis, Superintendent. Grand Canyon National Park <br /> <br />I>. 1~dJt. ~ Jlfac?u! taft (~JQ;'~ i' ""-:;1 <br />v~~ M cPv: vL~~h~ wiA-J- ~) df.L : <br />OJ--' !z.-L- ~I Cf Sc:.I6Yjf,'<;r <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.