My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP04111
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
4001-5000
>
WSP04111
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:53:46 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 12:09:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8220.101.09A
Description
Glen Canyon Dam/Lake Powell
State
AZ
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Date
6/1/1988
Title
Comments re: Glen Canyon Environmental Studies: Executive Review Committee Final Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
EIS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />-, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br /> <br />., <br /> <br />Memo rand lIIi <br /> <br />To: <br /> <br />From: <br /> <br />Subject: <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Unite1States Department of t! Interior <br />i' ( .. r ' <br /> <br /> <br />JUL <br /> <br />'5 1988 <br /> <br />ornCE OF THE SECRETAllY <br />WASHINGTON, D.C. 20240 <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />JUDe 16, 1988 <br /> <br />c.. _ <br /> <br />Director, Fish and Wildlife Service <br />Director, National Park Service <br />Commissioner. Bureau of Reclamation <br /> <br />Assistant Secretary - Water anJ 'jciJnc <br />Assistant Secretary - Fish and~li <br /> <br />61en Canyon Environmental Studies <br /> <br />~JUK 1 5 1988 <br /> <br />n~? <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />We have completed our review of the Executive Review Committee report on the <br />61en Canyon Enviromaental Studies (6CES). We agree with the Executive <br />Review CoIaittee that several arellS of concern require further study and <br />additional analysis before any action can be considered by the Department. <br /> <br />These arellS are: (1) the effects of both low and fluctuating flows on <br />enaarigered'f1s1i -species. the .trout fishery and beach aggradation and--'.: <br />degradation. and (2) detailed economic analysis of operational options. <br />With these concerns in mind. we accept your recoamendations to do further <br />study of the foregoing issues. and direct you to develop a coordinated study <br />plan that addresses theD. The study plan must be technically and <br />scientifically ad~uat! to iddj~S3 ~~ al6a~ of ec~c~~. lbe develop~nt of <br />the study plan should include input fral and give fair and appropriate <br />recognition to the concerns of: <br /> <br />a. Associated bureaus and agencies of the &CES program <br />b. All constituent groups <br />c. National AcadeII.Y of Sciences <br /> <br />The study plan also should address as many recommendations by the National <br />AcadeII.Y of Sciences as feasible in view of the ti~ available for additional <br />study effort. <br /> <br />The studies will require continued coordination among the bureaus and <br />agencies of the 6eES program. The technical components of the program <br />should be determined through a coordinated development and review process. <br />The overall program should be outlined and reviewed by the 6CES/Executive <br />Review Committee. If conflicts in coordination arise, our offices will be <br />available to help facilitate a resolution. <br /> <br />You are directed to continue to provide the staff support necessary to <br />accomplish the objectives of the 6CES program. This support will include <br />coordination of all aspects of the program. <br /> <br />The GCES program has been funded to date through CRSP power revenues under <br />the operation and maintenance program. This same fOnD of funding will be <br />followed for the completion of the additional tasks identified. <br /> <br />".-" <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.