Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />l <br /> <br />3918 <br />FRYINGPAN-ARKANSAS PROJECT, COLORADO <br /> <br />;.f <br />17 <br /> <br />67. Cost ailDeatian.-Construction costs have been allocatcd to the <br />various project f1mctions t,hr'ough use of thc alternative justifiable <br />expenditurc method. That method utilizes the est.imated cost of the <br />most economical substitute single-purpose facility which would pro- <br />vide ben,.fits equivalent to those accruing ill a multiple-purposc <br />development. The tcntatiye allocation of const.ruction costs llnd <br />distribution of fillnual operation, mamtenn.nce, and replacement <br />expenses are as follows: <br /> <br /> , <br /> Annual <br /> Constructton operation, <br /> Function "''' mfUntenance, <br /> a.ndrepl!L~ <br /> mcnt <br />lrrlgntion..._n______________..._______.__h.._____________._______._._____ ~9.930.000 $16,050 <br />Power_.________...._h._____..______.__....____.._______._________._______ 40.032.000 854,050 <br />Municipo'l Wll.ter.____..____.________.________.._________________________h 29.522,000 405,070 <br /> Total returnBble_.._n_ __n_. __n_._______.. ____ .__.__._ ___.___.__ ___ 129. 4St 000 1. 335,000 <br />Flood control..__.___________.n___.____________._____._________.___._n_~_ 15,777.000 (') <br />FIob oed wildHI6____...__________n__.__.______n___.__________________.__ 2, 1ill.uOO (') <br /> Total nonreturnable_.__n. __.__U._nn___. _______.____ ____u_.___~_ 17, 9S6.ClOO -------------- <br /> Total costs____...__________..______..__________n.__n_.._____._____ 147.440,000 J, 386, 200 <br /> <br />I Included above. <br /> <br />68. Project opernlion and return on 'investment.- The plan of opera- <br />tion calls for t.he formation of n. water conservan.cy distriet, under the <br />Colorado Vi utcr Conservancy District Act or 19:n, us amended, which <br />would contract with the Government. for paynlcn(, of project sen.ic€s <br />performed in t.he collection, storage, rt~gulu.tion, ancI release. of water. <br />Supplemental irrigation water at specificd rates would be released to <br />the district at reservoir outlets or possibly along the river, depending <br />upon circumstances. The pl"Oposed basic rate of $3,60 pe.r "crc-foot <br />at the Pueblo Rescrvoir has becn determined to bc within the payment <br />capacit,yof the water users. The district. would nsslIme responsibility <br />for delivery of irrigation watcr. This district, or possihly another <br />entity, would contrac.t with the Governfficlit for. Federal r::onstrucLion <br />of the specific municipal wate\, system, for district operat.ion and <br />maintenance of that system, and for delivcry of water from t.he joint <br />water-supply system. The district would also have other sOllrces of <br />annual revenue: levies from an ad va.lorem tax on taxahle property <br />benefited by the project, a service charge for t.he storage of the addi- <br />tionn.l Twin Lakes irrigation water, and a service charge for project <br />I. ..0 of the additional Colorado Fuel & Iron industrial water which <br />. uded with municipal supplics for pay-out analysis. Estimated <br />a ... project revenues, excluslve of re\-pellues expected from the <br />re ,- ation of winter water, are sho'j"ili the following table: <br /> <br />, ., ." J.j,i. . <br />lIt:ll'.' <br />',~ I .'\1\ l.,:: <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />.~II.',~,: <br />. <br /> <br />, <br />