Laserfiche WebLink
<br />r <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />,- <br /> <br />. ':".:...... <br />'~ ',\ <br />, "J <br />.~ ']," <br /> <br />.c'\ <br />j <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />37,000 acre-feet annually. This depletion would be within the <br />apportionment of consumptive use of water made to Colorado by the <br />Upper Colorado River Basin Compact and remaining for use by the <br />State after development of its authorized projects and other projects <br />likely to be developed prior to the Dallas Creek Project. <br /> <br />The National Park Service found that the Ridgway, Dallas Divide, and <br />Sneva Reservoirs would all be suitable for recreation. On the recom- <br />mendation of that Service, recreation development at each reservoir <br />is included in the project plan. project plans for the relocation of <br />roads and for the location of borrow areas and construction camps <br />would be coordinated with plans of that Service. Also, as recommended <br />by the National Park Service, project-acquired lands would not be used <br />for private summer homesites. Data on reereation development for each <br />of the project reservoirs are as follows: <br /> <br />Dallas <br />Ridgway Divide Sneva Total <br /> <br />Construction costs <br />Annual OM&R costs <br />Annual benefits <br /> <br />$766,000 <br />61,600 <br />270,000 <br /> <br />$300,000 <br />20,460 <br />50,400 <br /> <br />$25,000 <br />1,840 <br />3,800 <br /> <br />$1,091,000 <br />83,900 <br />324,200 <br /> <br />The Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife concluded that the project <br />as planned would mitigate losses and estimated that it would provide <br />about $80,700 annually in fishery and waterfowl production benefits. <br />In addition, the project would mitigate losses to wildlife SO far as <br />possible. On recommendation of that bureau, several measures are <br />included at a project cost of $196,000 specifically for conservation <br />and development of the fish and wildlife resources, and provision is <br />made for maintenance of streamflows for fishery so far as compatible <br />with other project purposes. <br /> <br />The project plan provides for the recommended Uncompahgre River flows <br />to be maintained at all times for fishery purposes, except in occasional <br />short winter periods in critically low runoff years when maintenance <br />would be incompatible with other project purposes. During these <br />critical periods, however, the flows would never. be permitted to drop <br />below 25 cubic feet per second. In order to maintain flows for fish <br />in the Uncompahgre River as planned, the capacity of Ridgway Reservoir <br />would need to be increased by about 40,000 acre-feet over the capacity <br />that would otherwise be required for project purposes. The flows <br />recommended for the ,West Fork would be maintained. from May to October <br />but normally the stream would be dewatered in the remainder of the <br />year by diversions to the Dallas Feeder Canal. Funds are included. for <br />measures to mitigate the fishery losses in the West Fork. <br /> <br />Deer range on Log Hill Mesa would be reduced with irrigation of new <br />lands but this loss would be partially mitigated by development of a <br /> <br />4 <br />