Laserfiche WebLink
<br />nZJ17)6 <br /> <br />Public Scoping Comments, Gunnison River Contract, cont.'" <br /> <br />STUDY. <br /> <br />STUDY. <br /> <br />STUDY. <br /> <br />S~r. <br /> <br />STUDy:, , '. <br />" <br />STUDY. <br />STlpY. <br />stUDY. <br />STUDY. <br />STUDY.. " <br />, .. <br />snJpY. <br /> <br />STUDY. <br /> <br />STUDY. <br /> <br />.:........ <br />.......:J....../. <br />.'"0 ,'~.' <br /> <br />4'. "66:" "Do we know ideal ramping rate? Was 800 cfs (per day increase rate) in <br />1992' too much? Ramping (rates needed) on ascending and descending release limbs. <br /> <br />..... . . :~ <br /> <br />4., 10., Flows: Troui Unlimited wants ecosystem view; don't base flow on anyone <br />speciaJ interest -- i.e. see study for Monument by Stanford/Ward on ecosystem approach. <br />. .\ <br /> <br />4. 12. BLM lacks data on ForkS area recreation use; has good data on other river <br />use. NPS (needs better) data to assess impacts. Need to know Monument river use - <br />'consider access from East P6rtal/Red Rocks. <br /> <br />4. 17. National Park Service and Bureau of Reclamation should quantify impacts of any <br />contract deliveries and deliveries for endangered fish of water on existing water uses/rights in <br />"GUnnison Basin. ' . <br /> <br />~. 10., Corp of Engin~rslFEMA made floodplain maps based on post-Aspinall <br />com~itioi1s.. . <br />-Will 'contract ,affect these maps/data? <br />-Will structures, 'end:,hp. inaiffereni flood-frequency category? <br /> <br />5. 22. <br />contract? <br /> <br />What is value ($) of water lost for future Colorado development because of <br /> <br />5. 24. <br />(recreation). <br /> <br />Study needed.'" loss of flatwater recreation losses vs, downstream <br /> <br />;:/t~:<.: ~ <br />..:;(t>) <br /> <br />'. ,.: <br /> <br />5. . 25. Hydrologic.'snidY needed for EIS: 'sediment study needed to determine <br />, . . J " . <br />flushing flow needs. .. '. , <br /> <br />5. <br /> <br />'I' .,' <br />26. StanfordIWard and 'other biological studies need to be used/included in EIS. <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />5. <br /> <br />.,H'.: <br /> <br />, 27., <br /> <br />, Studies sho~ld bedrine by qualified people. <br /> <br />BUITER: p2, '15. ' 9) 'The Aspinall Unit has resulted in substantial economic <br />benefits to western Colorado. These benefits have been manifested as increased tourism. <br />public power, and irrigation water supplies. What are the estimated economic losses to these <br />and other industries which ~ave benefitted from Aspinall waters? <br />.." ." <br /> <br />CREDA; p4, '15. On' page 13, you indicate that the effects of varied flow rates from Crystal <br />Dam have not been quantified. What studies have been identified as necessary to determine <br />tbe impacts of changing to varied flow rates from Crystal Dam on downstream resources? <br />What is the status of those studies? <br /> <br />CREDA; p5, '15. On page 2 of the proposed contract it states that Reclamation and the Park <br />Service have determined that water released from the Aspinall Unit for CRSP project purposes <br />can also be utilized to meet the objectives of the Black Canyon of the Gunnison NationC1\ <br />Monument and that the functions and purposes of both the Aspinall Unit and Monument can be <br />protected. What study or studies have been done to analyze these issues and provide support <br /> <br />:'~;~Y\ >~ <br /> <br />82 <br /> <br />'';'' ;~. "" <br />